PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2026Pest Management Science0 citationsOpen Access

Host tree preference and performance of the Eurasian spruce bark beetle ( Ips typographus ) on Scots pine

View Full Paper
JBJana Gabriele BurchardsDKDineshkumar KandasamyMAMartin Nils Andersson

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the attraction of Ips typographus to Scots pine and its reproductive success on this host.
  • Conducted short-range walking bioassays to assess attraction to Scots pine bark.
  • Performed two-choice bioassays with logs of Norway spruce and Scots pine.
  • Analyzed bark volatiles to compare monoterpene profiles between the two tree species.
  • Measured offspring weight and numbers from beetles reproducing in Scots pine logs.
  • Assessed emission levels of the aggregation pheromone cis-verbenol during colonization.
  • Ips typographus showed attraction to the odors from Scots pine bark in bioassays.
  • No significant preference was observed between Norway spruce and Scots pine bark odors.
  • Quantitative differences in monoterpenes were found, but none elicited a behavioral response when tested alone.
  • Beetles were able to reproduce in Scots pine logs, but with fewer and lighter offspring.
  • Emission of the aggregation pheromone cis-verbenol was reduced when colonizing Scots pine compared to Norway spruce.

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND The Eurasian spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus , is one of the most serious pests of Norway spruce (NS, Picea abies ), with the ability to infest and kill vigorous trees through pheromone‐mediated mass attacks. During outbreaks, I . typographus has been observed to occasionally attack Scots pine (SP, Pinus sylvestris ). We investigated in the laboratory whether I . typographus is attracted to SP bark and logs, which semiochemicals mediate this potential attraction, and how beetle fitness is affected by the host tree species. RESULTS Ips typographus was attracted to the odors from SP bark plugs in short‐range walking bioassays, and did not prefer the bark odors from NS over SP. In two‐choice bioassays with logs, the beetles also did not discriminate significantly between the tree species. Analysis of NS and SP bark volatiles revealed quantitative differences in abundant monoterpenes and their enantiomers; however, none of the monoterpenes elicited a behavioral response when tested individually. Furthermore, we showed that I . typographus can reproduce in SP logs but with reduced offspring weight and numbers. Finally, males emitted less of the aggregation pheromone component cis ‐verbenol when colonizing SP compared with NS. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that I. typographus is attracted to SP bark odors at short‐range and can reproduce in SP logs under laboratory conditions but with a reduced fitness. The reduced release of cis ‐verbenol may suggest a reduced likelihood of pheromone‐induced mass attacks on SP. © 2026 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Burchards et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d405ade8e28729cf654fdhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ps.70687
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper