PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 24, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

A cross-sectional analysis of male versus female flourishing among 202,898 participants across 22 countries on 73 variables in the global flourishing study

TLTim LomasRPR. Noah PadgettMWMeg A. Warren

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore male and female differences in flourishing across various dimensions of wellbeing.
  • Cross-sectional analysis of data from 202,898 participants across 22 countries.
  • Assessment of 73 variables related to wellbeing according to VanderWeele’s flourishing framework.
  • Comparison of male and female scores across six wellbeing domains.
  • Females perform better in happiness, social relationship quality, and meaning, while males excel in self-rated health and financial security.
  • Overall flourishing index shows males slightly ahead due to larger gaps in male-favored domains.
  • Findings vary significantly by country, indicating the influence of local socio-cultural factors.

Abstract

A prominent debate in modern society is how males or females are faring relative to each other. Despite a vast literature, most research is constrained by two issues: a limited conceptualization and assessment of what it means to do well; and a relatively narrow, often Western-centric coverage. To address these issues, this paper examines male-female differences on 73 items relating to all aspects of wellbeing in the Global Flourishing Study, with data from 202,898 participants across 22 countries. When organizing the items into six domains according to VanderWeele’s flourishing framework, females do slightly better on three (happiness and satisfaction, social relationship quality, and meaning and purpose), and males on two (self-rated health, and financial and material security), and with character/virtue equal. While all domains are weighted equally, since females are only marginally higher on three, whereas the gaps on the two male-led ones are much bigger, males fare slightly better on an overall flourishing index. There is also considerable country-level variation throughout the findings however, showing these general trends are not universal but contingent on local socio-cultural dynamics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lomas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699d405ade8e28729cf655fehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40963-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper