PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Scientific Reports2 citationsOpen Access

Late evening room light and sleep restriction reduces the ability of bright morning light to phase advance adolescents’ circadian clocks

AMAllison MonterastelliIMIeva MisiūnaitėCECharmane I. Eastman

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand how evening light exposure and sleep restriction affect morning bright light's ability to advance circadian rhythms in adolescents.
  • Participants experienced varying bedtimes delayed by 0, 1.5, 3, or 4.5 hours.
  • Each participant received 90 minutes of morning bright light exposure over three consecutive mornings.
  • Sleep opportunity varied between 5.5 to 10 hours for different groups.
  • Participants with 10 hours of sleep advanced their circadian clocks by an average of 2.0 hours.
  • Those with 8.5 hours of sleep advanced by only 0.5 hours.
  • Participants with restricted sleep (7 hours and 5.5 hours) experienced phase delays of 0.8 hours and 2.6 hours, respectively.

Abstract

Adolescents experience chronic partial sleep deprivation primarily due to late bedtimes and early school start times. Late bedtimes are partly driven by late (delayed) circadian rhythms. Morning bright light (MBL) advances (shifts earlier) circadian rhythms; however, extending evening light by staying awake late may delay the circadian clock and limit effectiveness of MBL. We investigated how increasing durations of late evening light coupled with sleep restriction affects the advancing ability of MBL in adolescents (14–17 years). Bedtime was delayed by 0 h (n = 11), 1.5 h (n = 9), 3 h (n = 12), or 4.5 h (n = 8), resulting in sleep opportunities of 10 h, 8.5 h, 7 h, or 5.5 h. Participants received 90 min of MBL on 3 consecutive mornings while the sleep/dark episode gradually shifted earlier. Participants in the 10-h and 8.5-h sleep groups phase advanced by 2.0 ± 1.1 h and 0.5 ± 0.6 h. Participants in the 7-h and 5.5-h sleep groups delayed by 0.8 ± 1.1 h and 2.6 ± 1.2 h. Thus, advance shifts from MBL were reduced in a step-wise manner with increasing duration of evening light and decreasing sleep opportunity, ultimately producing phase delays. These results suggest that MBL efficacy is reduced in adolescents with restricted sleep opportunities associated with late bedtimes and early school start times. These factors need to be considered in circadian-based treatment approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Monterastelli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e9143f5123be5ed04ea53https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37985-y
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness.1989 · 1,095 citations
  2. 2Effects of anabolic androgenic steroids on the development and expression of running wheel activity and circadian rhythms in male rats2007 · 58 citations
  3. 3Ultrashort sleep-waking schedule. III. ‘Gates’ and ‘Forbidden zones’ for sleep1986 · 478 citations
  4. 4National Sleep Foundation’s sleep time duration recommendations: methodology and results summary2015 · 4,411 citations
  5. 5Estimating the dim light melatonin onset of adolescents within a 6-h sampling window: the impact of sampling rate and threshold method2015 · 74 citations