PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Fractal and Fractional0 citationsOpen Access

Emergent Complexity over Symbolic Simplicity: Inductive Bias and Structural Failure in GANs

View Full Paper
CBCălin Gheorghe BuzeaFNFlorin NedeffDMDiana Carmen Mirila

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how the inductive biases of convolutional GANs affect their performance on fractal and Euclidean geometries.
  • Utilized multiple convolutional GAN architectures (DCGAN, WGAN-GP, SNGAN)
  • Compared performance using two resolutions (64 × 64 and 128 × 128)
  • Applied a range of evaluation metrics to assess training behavior
  • Studied the effects of inductive biases in generating fractal and Euclidean images
  • Fractal datasets showed stable training dynamics and high-quality image generation.
  • Euclidean datasets exhibited persistent structural failures across resolutions.
  • Geometry-aware metrics detected significant failures in global shape consistency for Euclidean outputs.
  • Findings highlight GANs' inductive bias towards locally rich structures rather than globally constrained geometries.

Abstract

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) perform well on natural images but often fail in domains governed by strict geometric or symbolic constraints. This work focuses on convolutional GANs and studies how their inductive biases interact with two contrasting types of synthetic image data: fractal patterns, characterized by self-similarity and scale-invariant local structure, and Euclidean shapes, defined by simple geometric primitives and rigid global constraints. Using multiple convolutional GAN architectures (DCGAN, WGAN-GP, and SNGAN), two resolutions (64 × 64 and 128 × 128), and a suite of evaluation metrics, we compare adversarial training behavior on these datasets under tightly controlled conditions. Fractal datasets yield stable training dynamics and perceptually plausible generations, whereas Euclidean shape datasets consistently exhibit structural failure modes that persist under higher resolution, smoother shape representations, and architectural stabilization. Geometry-aware metrics reveal severe violations of global shape consistency in Euclidean outputs that are not reliably captured by standard perceptual or distributional measures such as FID, SSIM, or LPIPS. We argue that these findings reflect a fundamental inductive bias of convolutional generative models toward a locally rich, scale-repeating structure rather than globally constrained geometry. Rather than indicating that fractals are intrinsically easier to model, our results show that Euclidean geometry exposes limitations of adversarial generative learning that remain hidden under conventional evaluation. From this perspective, fractal datasets serve as informative diagnostic benchmarks for probing how adversarially trained convolutional generators handle scale-invariant structure versus globally constrained geometry, and our results highlight the need for domain-aware metrics and alternative architectural biases when applying generative models to structured or symbolic data.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Buzea et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e9152f5123be5ed04eca3https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract10020133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hybrid FEM-AI Approach for Thermographic Monitoring of Biomedical Electronic Devices2025 · 37 citations
  2. 2Chaos and Fractals2004 · 538 citations
  3. 3Deconvolution and Checkerboard Artifacts2016 · 1,708 citations
  4. 4Fractal Geometry2003 · 1,730 citations