PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 20260 citations

Mnoga lica demijurga: književna recepcija Platonovog Timaja u srednjem veku i renesansi

View Full Paper
NPNoel Putnik

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the manuscript tradition of the Timaeus and its interpretations throughout the Middle Ages and Renaissance.
  • Analyzes the manuscript tradition of the Timaeus in the Latin West.
  • Examines translations by Cicero and Calcidius, along with interpretations by Christian theologians and Marsilio Ficino.
  • Considers the cultural and historical context of various interpretations.
  • Identifies the Timaeus as the only Platonic work widely available in the West during the Middle Ages.
  • Highlights the diverse interpretations from different epochs and their significance in reception studies.
  • Discusses Ficino's interpretation as marginal but pivotal in the history of ideas.

Abstract

The Timaeus holds a special place in the body of Plato’s works. Modern scholarly evaluations range from considering it the most difficult of Plato’s writings to comprehend, to regarding it as the most important work in the Corpus Platonicum. Such variations in assessments are not surprising as it is an exceptionally complex text, weaving together themes of cosmogony, cosmology, metaphysics and anthropology. The manuscript tradition has also contributed to these diverse evaluations, setting the Timaeus apart from others. It is the only Platonic work that was almost continuously available to the European West throughout the Middle Ages, albeit in translation and in fragmentary form. Even so, it exerted a strong influence on philosophy and theology, especially in the Renaissance. In this essay I briefly address the manuscript tradition of the Timaeus and its interpretations in the Latin West: from Cicero’s and Calcidius’s translations, through the interpretations of Christian theologians, to Marsilio Ficino. Considering its lasting and multifaceted influence, I approach the Timaeus as an exemplary case study in the field of reception studies, arguing that its interpretations in different epochs speak more about the epochs themselves and their cultural-historical and social context than about the dialogue proper. Moreover, Ficino’s interpretation is a significant case of marginal reception, which never became part of the mainstrean but nevertheless has its important role in the history of ideas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Noel Putnik (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e9166f5123be5ed04ee71https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18724790
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Critical Evaluation of Gadamer’s Interpretation of Plato’s Timaeus2024
  2. 2Proclus. Commentary on Plato’s “Timaeus”. Book II (Translation and Commentary)2025
  3. 3The Timaeus as an Origin Story2026
  4. 4The Influence of Plato's Timaeus on Cappadocian Thought2025
  5. 5Plato’s Dietetics for Intellectuals in Timaeus 86b–90d2024