PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Cureus0 citationsOpen Access

Improving OB/GYN Resident Ultrasound Education Through a Simulation-Based Curriculum

ITIlina TerziyskiLHLuke P HansenSDShena J. Dillon

Key Points

  • To evaluate the impact of a simulation-based ultrasound curriculum on OB/GYN resident confidence and ultrasound case logs.
  • Prospective study comparing two cohorts of PGY1 residents: one with simulation training and one without.
  • Assessment of confidence scores and case logs at the end of the PGY1 year.
  • Paired Student t-tests performed to analyze statistical significance.
  • 2022-2023 cohort logged an average of 153 transvaginal and 29 obstetric sonograms.
  • 2023-2024 cohort logged an average of 130 transvaginal and 6 obstetric sonograms.
  • No significant difference in confidence scores between the two cohorts (p > 0.17).

Abstract

Introduction: Ultrasound is a fundamental skill of practicing obstetrician-gynecologists with proficiency ideally obtained in training. However, ultrasound training in residency has not been standardized and varies based on clinical experience and the number of ultrasounds performed. Simulation provides a way to standardize training while incorporating hands-on skills. This study evaluated the effects of a simulation-based ultrasound curriculum on resident confidence and the number of cases logged. Methods: This is a prospective study comparing the differences in end-of-year postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) obstetric/gynecology (OB/GYN) resident confidence and case logs in ultrasonography with and without a simulation curriculum. PGY1 residents from the 2022-2023 cohort did not train on a simulation curriculum prior to the start of their clinical training, while the PGY1 residents from the 2023-2024 class underwent both curricular training and simulated image capture. Although some residents may have had some didactic exposure to ultrasound in medical school, that experience was not taken into account. Both groups had confidence scores and case logs obtained at the end of their PGY1 year. Paired Student t-tests were performed. Results: The 2022-2023 cohort performed on average 153 transvaginal and 29 obstetric sonograms. The 2023-2024 cohort performed on average 130 transvaginal and six obstetric sonograms. The end-of-year questionnaire showed no significant difference in ultrasound confidence between the two cohorts (all items p > 0.17). Conclusions: Although the class that underwent simulation training had fewer ultrasound numbers per resident, they showed confidence ratings similar to the class with more cases. With simulation, fewer clinical sonograms may be needed to achieve the same confidence level. A standardized simulation curriculum could be a helpful adjunct to residency programs to address variance in clinical ultrasound training, and a larger-scale study to confirm these preliminary findings would be justified.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Terziyski et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e9177f5123be5ed04efe3https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.104115
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper