PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Pharmaceuticals2 citationsOpen Access

Novel Propofol Analogs: Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of Dihydrobenzofuran Derivatives as General Anesthetics

View Full Paper
JSJun-Jie ShiJFJia-Quan FengYZYuanhai Zou

Key Points

  • To design and evaluate new dihydrobenzofuran derivatives as safer analogs of propofol with improved anesthetic properties.
  • Designed dihydrobenzofuran derivatives through conformational restriction
  • Conducted loss of righting reflex assay to assess sedative/anesthetic properties
  • Performed respiratory depression tests for safety assessment
  • Designed compound 53A showed higher potency and wider safety margin than propofol
  • 53A maintained similar onset and recovery times as propofol
  • Phosphate prodrug 56A demonstrated better efficiency and safety than fospropofol
  • 53A alleviated adverse respiratory depression effects

Abstract

Background: Propofol is used worldwide as a short-acting intravenous anesthetic in clinical practice; however, side effects such as injection pain and respiratory depression remain clinically relevant. Therefore, identification of safer propofol analogs is required. Method: In response to the urgent need for optimized potency and reduced side effects, a series of dihydrobenzofuran derivatives were designed as expectedly better propofol analogs through conformational restriction. A loss of righting reflex assay was conducted to evaluate the sedative/anesthetic properties of the synthesized compounds, and a respiratory depression test was performed for safety assessment. Results: Most of the designed compounds were shown to possess promising anesthetic properties as propofol analogs. The represented 53A had higher potency and a wider safety margin (ED50:3.898 vs. 8.040 mg/kg in mice; 2.985 vs. 5.894 mg/kg in rats; TI (therapeutic index): 6.172 vs. 5.061 in mice; 4.362 vs. 2.580 in rats) than propofol, and fast onset and recovery times were maintained. The phosphate prodrug 56A also exhibited better efficiency and safety than fospropofol, along with a longer duration and faster recovery time in sedative profiles. Furthermore, alleviation of the adverse effects of respiratory depression has been demonstrated. Conclusions: 53A has the potential to be selected as a preclinical candidate for clinical development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e918df5123be5ed04f1f4https://doi.org/10.3390/ph19020342
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper