PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Deterministic Decision Authority Framework for Governance-Grade AI Systems

View Full Paper
YKYASIN KALAFATOGLU

Key Points

  • The aim is to introduce a framework that governs AI decision authority under uncertainty, irreversibility, and time pressure.
  • Developed a risk function weighted for irreversibility
  • Normalized exposure based on time decay
  • Implemented activation constraints for non-autonomous systems
  • Established verification logic for deterministic replay
  • Integrated human-final authority layers
  • Outputs categorized into defined governance states (GO / HOLD / NO-GO)
  • Framework ensures unauthorized execution is prevented
  • Supports reproducible audit trails and institutional compliance
  • Facilitates decision-making across high-impact sectors like finance and energy

Abstract

BackgroundHigh-impact institutional decisions increasingly rely on AI-assisted analytics, yet most systems lack deterministic governance constraints. While explainability and audit logs provide post-hoc traceability, they do not formally condition decision authority under uncertainty, irreversibility, and time pressure. ObjectiveThis paper introduces a Deterministic Decision Authority Framework designed for governance-grade institutional environments. The architecture constrains decision activation through formalized irreversibility weighting, uncertainty decomposition, and time-bound authority gating. MethodologyThe proposed framework integrates: An irreversibility-weighted risk function Time-decay normalization of exposure Non-autonomous activation constraints Deterministic replay verification logic Human-final authority enforcement layer The system is mathematically structured to prevent unauthorized execution and to ensure reproducible audit trails. ArchitectureThe model separates intelligence generation from execution authority.Outputs are classified into governance states (e.g., GO / HOLD / NO-GO), with deterministic replay compatibility and uncertainty thresholds embedded at the decision gate level. ContributionUnlike autonomous AI models, this framework positions decision intelligence as constrained infrastructure rather than executable agency. The architecture formalizes authority boundaries, integrates irreversibility metrics, and enables institutional-grade compliance alignment. ImplicationsThe proposed structure supports high-impact domains such as finance, energy infrastructure, and public-sector governance, where decision errors carry asymmetric and irreversible consequences.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

YASIN KALAFATOGLU (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e919cf5123be5ed04f475https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18743567
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Decision Authority Infrastructure: A Deterministic, Human-Final Governance Framework for Non-Autonomous AI Systems2025
  2. 2Deterministic Governance of High-Risk AI Decisions Under Irreversibility Constraints2026
  3. 3Human-Final Decision Authority in Artificial Intelligence: A Deterministic and Auditable Governance Architecture2025
  4. 4Deterministic Execution Authority Under Irreversibility Constraints: A Hybrid Governance Model for AI and Capital-Intensive Systems2026
  5. 5Engineering Executive Authority in Deterministic AI Systems: A Governance Architecture for Capital-Sensitive Institutions2026