PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open1 citationsOpen Access

Secondary overtriage: impact of trauma center designation and trauma system integration

View Full Paper
DHDarrell L. HuntHMHarun MazumderJRJordan Rahm

Key Points

  • The study aims to determine the relationship between transfer from Level III trauma centers and the rate of secondary overtriage.
  • Single-center, retrospective cohort study of trauma patients transferred to a tertiary trauma center.
  • Analyzed data from transfers between August 2021 and July 2023.
  • Used American College of Surgeons trauma center designations to categorize referring facilities.
  • Applied multiple variable regression analysis to evaluate overtriage rates.
  • Total of 2309 patients transferred from 20 facilities, with 5 Level III trauma centers.
  • Secondary overtriage rates were 23.5% at Level III centers compared to 28.4% at non-Level III centers.
  • Non-Level III center patients had 31% higher odds of secondary overtriage (OR: 1.31).
  • Non-Level III transfer patients experienced significantly shorter average lengths of stay.

Abstract

Background Secondary overtriage in trauma refers to the interfacility transfer of minimally and moderately injured patients who do not require major interventions, resulting in short stays at tertiary receiving facilities. Secondary overtriage rates are commonly used as a measure of trauma system efficiency, focused on the optimal allocation and use of healthcare resources. However, limited data exist examining the impact of Level III trauma centers (L3TC) on secondary overtriage rates. Therefore, this study aimed to determine whether transfer from L3TCs, compared with non-trauma facilities, was associated with a lower rate of secondary overtriage among patients subsequently admitted to a Level I trauma center. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of trauma patients transferred to a tertiary trauma center between 1 August 2021 and 31 July 2023. The primary exposure was the American College of Surgeons-verified or state-designated trauma center level of the referring facilities. Multiple variable regression analysis was applied to three models: (1) unadjusted, (2) adjusted for patient characteristics and (3) adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics. Results A total of 2309 patients were transferred to our tertiary trauma center from 20 referring facilities, including 15 non-L3TCs and 5 L3TCs. Secondary overtriage rates were significantly lower at L3TCs (23.5% vs 28.4%, p=0.009). On multivariable regression analysis, even after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, the odds of secondary overtriage from non-L3TCs remained 31% higher compared with L3TCs (OR: 1.31 (1.02, 1.67)). Non-L3TC transfer patients had a 12% shorter average hospital length of stay (LOS), a 21% shorter average intensive care unit LOS, and a 39% shorter average ventilator LOS (all p<0.05). Conclusions In this study, secondary overtriage rates were significantly lower for L3TCs compared with non-L3TCs, even after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics. These findings suggest that L3TCs benefit from state-mandated healthcare resource investment and trauma system integration. Level of evidence Level III, Therapeutic/Care Management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hunt et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e91b2f5123be5ed04f614https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-002027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper