PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026PLoS ONE1 citationsOpen Access

Development of DHODH inhibitors incorporating virtual screening, pharmacophore modeling, fragment-based optimization methods, ADMET, molecular docking, molecular dynamics, PCA analysis, and free energy landscape

View Full Paper
QWQu WangYXYu Hao XuHJHeng Jiang

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop effective inhibitors for dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) to target cancer therapy.
  • Virtual screening of FDA-approved drugs identified candidate compounds.
  • Pharmacophore modeling refined the candidates to six, based on docking scores.
  • Fragment-based optimization enhanced the identified compounds.
  • ADMET profiling assessed safety and viability of the compounds.
  • Molecular docking and dynamics simulated binding interactions for confirmation.
  • Twenty potential DHODH compounds were identified through screening.
  • Two high-affinity candidates showed promising docking scores over 197.
  • Molecular dynamics confirmed stable binding conformation with minimal changes for compound 66.
  • PCA and free energy landscape analyses supported the findings.

Abstract

The overexpression of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH) in various malignant tumor cells is significantly associated with ferroptosis, making DHODH inhibition a promising strategy for cancer therapy. In this study, we employed an integrated approach to screen and optimize DHODH inhibitor candidates. First, virtual screening of the FDA-approved drug library identified 20 potential compounds (with the positive control AG-636 as a benchmark, docking score: 133. 166). Subsequent pharmacophore modeling (ROC curve value >0. 8) further narrowed the candidates to six compounds, which underwent fragment displacement optimization. All optimized compounds were evaluated for absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) properties. Molecular docking identified compounds 65: (4S) -2, 2-dimethyl-1, 3-dioxolan-4-ylmethyl 3- (4- (2S) -2-hydroxypropyloxyphenyl) (docking score: 197. 362) and 66: (4S) -2, 2-dimethyl-1, 3-dioxolan-4-ylmethyl 4- (4- (2S) -2-hydroxypropyloxyphenyl) (docking score: 202. 623) as high-affinity candidates. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, principal component analysis (PCA), and free energy landscape (FEL) analyses confirmed stable binding conformations for both compounds. Notably, compound 66: (4S) -2, 2-dimethyl-1, 3-dioxolan-4-ylmethyl 4- (4- (2S) -2-hydroxypropyloxyphenyl) exhibited minimal conformational changes, suggesting superior binding stability. This study advances compound 66: (4S) -2, 2-dimethyl-1, 3-dioxolan-4-ylmethyl 4- (4- (2S) -2-hydroxypropyloxyphenyl) as a promising DHODH inhibitor candidate through a multimodal workflow integrating structure-based pharmacophore design, fragment optimization, ADMET profiling, and advanced molecular simulations, providing a novel avenue for DHODH-targeted antitumor therapies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e91c4f5123be5ed04f7cdhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342461
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper