PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 20260 citations

The Pretransplant EASIX Score Predicts Transplant-Related Mortality in Children Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Non-Malignant Disorders.

View Full Paper
VUVedat UygunVHV. HazarKYKoray Yalçın

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the EASIX score's ability to predict transplant-related mortality in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT for non-malignant disorders.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis of 475 pediatric patients with non-malignant diseases.
  • Utilized ROC curve analysis to determine the optimal EASIX pretransplant cut-off point.
  • Assessed correlations between EASIX scores and transplant-related mortality.
  • TRM was 24.6% in patients with high EASIX scores compared to 7.9% in low EASIX scores (p < 0.001).
  • Overall survival was lower at 73.6% for high EASIX compared to 92.3% for low EASIX (p < 0.001).
  • The EASIX score showed internal consistency in predicting TRM but requires external validation.

Abstract

The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) represents a significant advancement in the assessment of risk for pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). While EASIX has been extensively studied in adults, emerging research indicates its potential utility in children. We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 475 pediatric patients with non-malignant diseases who underwent allogeneic HSCT. The primary objective was to explore the correlation between the pretransplant EASIX score (EASIXpre) and transplant-related mortality (TRM) following HSCT. Our study utilized ROC curve analysis to determine an optimal cut-off point at EASIX-pre = 2. Within two years, TRM was 24.6% (95% CI 15.6-38.6) in patients with high EASIX scores, compared to just 7.9% (95% CI 5.7-11.0) in those with low scores (p < 0.001). Additionally, overall survival rates at two years were lower for the high EASIX group: 73.6% (95% CI 62.1-85.1) versus 92.3% (95% CI 89.8-94.9) (p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, the ROC-optimized cut-off of 2 demonstrated internal consistency in our cohort, confirming its association with TRM. However, this does not represent external validation, which requires independent pediatric cohorts. In conclusion, the EASIX score stands out as a valuable and cost-effective biomarker for predicting transplant outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT for non-malignant diseases.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Uygun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e91eaf5123be5ed04fc32https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70487
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper