PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 25, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine2 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes of First-Line PARP Inhibitor Therapy in Ovarian Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

View Full Paper
BKBaris KoksalHYHASAN ÇAĞRI YILDIRIMDGDeniz Can Guven

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to assess the outcomes of first-line PARP inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
  • Conducted a retrospective, multicenter study across 33 centers in Türkiye
  • Included 179 newly diagnosed patients treated with olaparib or niraparib
  • Collected clinical, pathological, and molecular data, including BRCA mutation status
  • Analyzed survival outcomes using Kaplan–Meier methods
  • Median progression-free survival was not reached for the cohort
  • Estimated PFS rates were 91.0% at 6 months, 83.0% at 12 months, and 64.0% at 24 months
  • Patients with pathogenic BRCA mutations had longer PFS compared to those with likely pathogenic variants
  • Any-grade adverse events occurred in 73.7% of patients, with hematologic toxicities being the most common
  • No cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia were reported

Abstract

Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been established as a first-line maintenance therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following platinum-based chemotherapy. While phase III trials have demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefits with olaparib and niraparib, real-world data remain limited. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter real-world study included 179 patients with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian treated with first-line maintenance olaparib or niraparib across 33 centers in Türkiye between January 2014 and March 2025. Clinical, pathological, and molecular data—including BRCA (Breast Cancer Susceptibility Gene) mutation status, origin, and variant classification—was collected. The primary endpoint was PFS, and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier methods. Results: Of 179 patients, 110 received olaparib and 69 received niraparib. BRCA mutations were present in 88.3% of patients, while 11.7% had unknown HRD status. Median follow-up was 16.5 months, and median PFS was not reached. Estimated PFS rates for the overall cohort were 91.0% at 6 months, 83.0% at 12 months, and 64.0% at 24 months. In the olaparib cohort, BRCA-mutant patients demonstrated PFS rates of 89%, 78%, 73%, and 64% at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. In the niraparib cohort, corresponding PFS rates among BRCA-mutant patients were 87% at 6 months and 75% at 12 months. Patients harboring pathogenic BRCA variants experienced longer PFS compared with those with likely pathogenic variants. Any-grade adverse events occurred in 73.7% of patients, and grade 3–4 events in 29.6%, with hematologic toxicities predominating. Dose interruptions were more frequent with niraparib, while treatment discontinuation rates were low in both groups. No cases of myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia were observed. Conclusions: In this large multicenter real-world cohort, first-line maintenance therapy with olaparib and niraparib provided durable PFS benefit in patients with advanced EOC, particularly among those with pathogenic BRCA mutations, confirming their effectiveness and manageable safety profiles in routine clinical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koksal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699e920af5123be5ed04ffc5https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041657
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper