PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 2019Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences16 citationsOpen Access

Decision Making and Alcohol: Health Policy Implications

View Full Paper
CDClintin P. Davis‐StoberKMKayleigh N. McCartyDMDenis M. McCarthy

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Many negative outcomes associated with alcohol consumption stem from individual decision making, such as the decision whether or not to drive after drinking. Understanding biases in decision making as they relate to alcohol, and measuring variability in decision strategies across individuals, can be a tool for improving policy. For alcohol-related policy, both addiction and the acute effects of intoxication are potential sources of bias or heterogeneity in decision strategy, and we provide a brief primer on how they can affect decision making. We then discuss two alcohol policy domains, alcohol impaired driving and excessive consumption. We review potential implications of major findings in decision making research for each of these domains, and point out how policy could take account of biases and variability in decision making.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Davis‐Stober et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699ec7bd78959400f1132febhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218818587
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper