PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Structural barriers drive gender inequality across academic careers in Brazilian ecology

View Full Paper
ACAna Paula Lula CostaJCJuliana Rosa Matias CicchetoMSMyrna Elis Ferreira Santos

Key Points

  • The research aimed to understand factors influencing gender inequality in Brazilian academic careers in ecology.
  • Nationwide survey conducted with 283 Brazilian ecologists
  • Analysis of gender-based differences across career stages
  • Utilized descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and correspondence analysis
  • Women reported more frequent experiences of gender discrimination and sexual harassment
  • Lower publication rates and limited access to leadership roles for women
  • Both genders identified a lack of funding as a primary barrier to scientific productivity

Abstract

Although women often outnumber men in the early stages of academic careers in ecology, they remain significantly underrepresented in senior positions. In Brazil, women comprise the majority of graduate students in ecological sciences but hold fewer senior academic roles, receive less research funding, and face greater obstacles to visibility and recognition. To understand the factors contributing to this disparity, we conducted a nationwide survey with 283 Brazilian ecologists, analysing gender-based differences across career stages. Using descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and correspondence analysis (ANACOR), we examined experiences related to gender identity, parenthood, workplace dynamics, and scientific productivity. Our findings reveal persistent structural inequalities: women, particularly in early-career stages, reported more frequent experiences of gender discrimination and sexual harassment, limited access to leadership roles, lower publication rates, and heightened concerns about personal safety during fieldwork. Women more commonly cited personal and professional constraints as factors influencing their academic permanence. Overall, both men and women identified a lack of funding as the primary barrier to scientific productivity. These results underscore the intersectional barriers to gender equity in ecology and emphasise the urgency of structural, evidence-based reforms to build more inclusive academic environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Costa et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699f956d1bc9fecf3dab3283https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38278-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper