PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Open Heart0 citationsOpen Access

Diagnostic delay and phenotypic differences in cardiac sarcoidosis: a descriptive study of diagnostic and follow-up clinical data

View Full Paper
SKSusanna KullbergKarolinska University HospitalJFJonas FaxénKarolinska University HospitalJCJulia Cagan

Key Points

  • To investigate the impact of diagnostic delay and phenotypic variances on outcomes in cardiac sarcoidosis patients.
  • Retrospective analysis of 95 cardiac sarcoidosis patients diagnosed between 2003 and 2024.
  • Extraction of clinical data from electronic health records including symptoms, therapies, and follow-up information.
  • Comparison of patients with de novo cardiac sarcoidosis and those with prior extracardiac sarcoidosis.
  • Median time from first symptoms to cardiac sarcoidosis diagnosis was 9 months, indicating diagnostic delays.
  • Patients with diagnostic delays were more likely to require cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator (p=0.01).
  • De novo patients with reduced LVEF were noted at follow-up (p=0.006) despite receiving more immunosuppressant therapy.

Abstract

Background Worse prognosis in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is likely associated with diagnostic delay and cardiac involvement as first sarcoidosis (de novo) presentation, but data are limited. Methods We retrospectively investigated 95 patients with CS diagnosed 2003–2024. Using electronic health records, the date of first CS symptoms/signs, immunosuppressant therapy and follow-up data including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), biomarkers and cardiac device therapy were extracted. Median time from first symptoms/signs to CS diagnosis (9 months) was used to define delayed diagnosis. Results Implantation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator was more likely in patients with diagnostic delay (p=0.01). No difference was observed in time to diagnosis between patients with de novo CS (n=49) and those with prior extracardiac sarcoidosis (ECS) (n=46). Severe symptoms at disease onset were more common in de novo CS. At a median of 46 months from diagnosis, de novo patients more often had reduced LVEF (p=0.006) and an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (p<0.05) than those with prior ECS despite receiving more immunosuppressant therapy. De novo patients with diagnostic delay more often had reduced LVEF at CS presentation. Conclusions Symptom presentation is likely associated with diagnostic delay, but the disease presentation and course seem more severe in de novo CS and may not be altered by immunosuppressants, or demand more aggressive therapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kullberg et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699f95a81bc9fecf3dab3b19https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2025-003934
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper