PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces0 citations

Electrical Junction at the Substrate–Fe 3 O 4 Nanoparticle Interface Governs Oxygen Evolution Reaction Activity

View Full Paper
NPNhu-Quynh PhanAMAref H. MamakhelABAnders Bæk Borup

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore how the substrate-catalyst interface affects oxygen evolution reaction efficiency in Fe3O4 nanoparticles.
  • Tested different metals as substrates with varied work functions.
  • Measured performance metrics including overpotentials and Tafel slopes.
  • Used Ni2P as a buffer layer to modify the substrate-catalyst interface.
  • Ohmic junctions with low work function metals showed lower overpotentials compared to Schottky junctions.
  • Tafel slopes of Ohmic junctions were significantly reduced.
  • Interface tuning from Schottky to Ohmic improved performance metrics.

Abstract

The oxygen evolution reaction (OER) can be fundamentally considered as a process in which an electrocatalyst converts electrical energy to chemical energy. In nanoparticle-based OER devices, current flows through complex substrate-particle and interparticle junctions before delivering the energy at the catalyst-electrolyte interface. Performance optimization requires the right combination of the metallic substrate and semiconducting catalyst. We demonstrate that the performance of Fe3O4 nanoparticles is strongly influenced by the principle of energy matching at the substrate-catalyst interface. Using substrates with distinct work functions, we show that the Ohmic junctions, formed between Fe3O4 and low work function metals (Cu, Ni), exhibit significantly lower overpotentials and Tafel slopes than Schottky junctions formed with high work function materials (glassy carbon (GC), Pt, and Au). Furthermore, we tune the GC and Fe3O4 nanoparticle interface from Schottky to Ohmic by introducing a Ni2P buffer layer. Our findings highlight the importance of interfacial engineering for designing efficient water electrolysis devices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Phan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe24b95ddcd3a253e61bdhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6c00310
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Size Dependence of Metal–Insulator Transition in Stoichiometric Fe3O4 Nanocrystals2015 · 109 citations
  2. 2Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis2012 · 72,644 citations
  3. 3Interface state mapping in a Schottky barrier of the organic semiconductor terrylene2002 · 58 citations
  4. 4X-ray photoemission studies of diamond, graphite, and glassy carbon valence bands1974 · 552 citations
  5. 5Seven mechanisms of oxygen evolution reaction proposed recently: A mini review2024 · 151 citations