PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026PeerJ0 citationsOpen Access

Occurrence and prognosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatosis liver disease and gastrointestinal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

SDSiyu DuanYWYiyi WeiZDZhuoyu Ding

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the relationship between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and gastrointestinal tumors.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.
  • Searched databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase until November 2025.
  • Performed quality assessment and data extraction by two investigators.
  • Calculated hazard ratios and confidence intervals for analysis using Stata.
  • Found significant associations between MASLD and several gastrointestinal tumors.
  • Colorectal polyps showed HR = 1.42, colorectal cancer HR = 1.22, and esophagus cancer HR = 1.14.
  • Gastric cancer had HR = 1.18, cholangiocarcinoma HR = 1.26, and gallbladder cancer HR = 1.41.
  • Incidence rates of GI cancer in MASLD patients were highly correlated.

Abstract

Background The metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is one of the most common causes of chronic and abnormal liver function tests globally. The relationship between metabolic MASLD and gastrointestinal tumors (GI) remains controversial. Methodology We conducted a systematic review based on a protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024590389). PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were systematically searched until November 2025, Quality assessment and data extraction were performed by two investigators, and the hazard ratios and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were combined using Stata for data analysis. Results A total of 29 studies were included, we found that MASLD were related to colorectal polyps ( I 2 = 62.7, HR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.22–1.66), colorectal cancer ( I 2 = 82.8%, HR = 1.22, 95% CI 1.16–1.29), p < 0.001) and esophagus cancer ( I 2 =88.4, HR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.05–1.24, p < 0.001), gastric cancer ( I 2 = 88, HR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.1–1.26), cholangiocarcinoma ( I 2 = 73.7, HR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.1 7–1. 36, P < 0.001) and gallbladder cancer ( I 2 = 56.1, HR = 1.41, 95% CI 1.03–1.92, P < 0.001). Factors like follow-up time, study methods and countries contributed to heterogeneity of studies. Lastly, incidence rates (IR) and prognosis of GI cancer in patients with MASLD were highly correlated. Conclusion We conclude that there is a significant association and prognosis between MASLD and gastrointestinal tumors. Further studies should focus on prospective studies and mechanistic insights.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Duan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe2fe95ddcd3a253e6852https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20616
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease and MetALD increases the risk of liver cancer and gastrointestinal cancer: A nationwide cohort study2024 · 33 citations
  2. 2Gastrointestinal cancer classification and prognostication from histology using deep learning: Systematic review2021 · 193 citations
  3. 3Prospective association of liver function biomarkers with development of hepatobiliary cancers2016 · 62 citations
  4. 4Nonalcoholic Cirrhosis Increased Risk of Digestive Tract Malignancies2015 · 19 citations
  5. 5The Complexities of Epidemiology and Prevention of Gastrointestinal Cancers2012 · 26 citations