PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Processes1 citationsOpen Access

Study on Mechanical Response of Composite Rock Mass with Different Coal Seam Dip Angles Under Impact Load

View Full Paper
TQTao QinYSYue SongYZYuan Zhang

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how varying dip angles of coal seams affect the mechanical response of composite rock masses under impact loads.
  • Conducted dynamic impact compression tests using a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar system.
  • Analyzed rock-coal-rock composites with dip angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°.
  • Utilized high-speed imaging to observe mechanical properties and failure characteristics.
  • Dynamic compressive strength and elastic modulus showed significant strain-rate hardening effects.
  • Compressive strength decreased with increasing dip angle, especially notable between 15° and 30°.
  • At an impact pressure of 0.12 MPa, compressive strength dropped by 36.9% in the critical zone.
  • Energy distribution was influenced by interface geometries, with reflected energy ratio reaching 80.7%.

Abstract

To investigate the dynamic instability mechanism of surrounding rock in deep, rockburst-prone coal seams, a Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) system was utilized to carry out dynamic impact compression tests on Rock–Coal–Rock (RCR) composites featuring four different seam dip angles, namely 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45°. We systematically analyze incorporating high-speed imaging, the mechanical properties, energy evolution, and progressive failure characteristics of the composites under various strain rates. The results indicate that the dynamic compressive strength and elastic modulus of the composites exhibit a significant strain-rate hardening effect. With the increase in the dip angle of the coal seam, the compressive strength of the specimen decreases accordingly. Specifically, the range of 15–30° is identified as a critical transition zone where the failure mode shifts from matrix-dominated bearing to interfacial slip instability. At an impact pressure of 0.12 MPa, the compressive strength drops by 36.9% within this interval. Furthermore, the energy distribution is profoundly modulated by the geometric characteristics of the interface. As the dip angle increases, the degree of wave impedance mismatch at the coal–rock interface intensifies, leading to a sharp rise in the reflected energy ratio (up to 80.7%) and a pronounced attenuation of transmitted energy. Notably, the dissipation energy per unit volume increases with the dip angle, revealing that interfacial sliding and frictional work become the primary energy dissipation pathways under large-inclination conditions. High-speed camera monitoring confirms that the instability mechanism shifts from axial splitting/tension to an interfacial shear-slip mode as the dip angle increases. These findings provide a scientific reference for the stability evaluation of roadway surrounding rock and the prevention of dynamic disasters.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe32295ddcd3a253e6c83https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14050738
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper