PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Periosteal Fenestration Procedure in Apically Positioned Flap Increases the Attached Mucosal Width: An In Vivo Experimental Study

View Full Paper
IHInpyo HongSJSeungho JeongHSHae Jee Shin

Key Points

  • To assess the effectiveness of periosteal fenestration combined with apically positioned flap in enhancing masticatory mucosa width and to evaluate its histological characteristics.
  • Utilized a split-mouth design in six mongrel dogs
  • Compared apically positioned flap alone and with periosteal fenestration
  • Measured clinical and digitally scanned mucosal width at baseline, post-op, and after 8 weeks
  • Analyzed histological properties including non-keratinized mucosa width using a linear mixed model
  • Mean gain in clinical mucosal width was 3.17 mm in the control group and 4.27 mm in the fenestration group
  • Significant increase in mucosal width for the fenestration group with a mean difference of 1.45 mm (p = 0.002)
  • Histological results showed predominance of non-keratinized epithelium in the fenestration group

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of the apically positioned flap (APF) with periosteal fenestration in increasing the width of the masticatory mucosa (MM, including attached and keratinized mucosa) and to assess the histological properties of the MM gained through this technique. Materials and methods: Six mongrel dogs were treated using a split-mouth design, with APF alone (control) and APF with periosteal fenestration (test) applied from the first to the fourth maxillary premolars on both sides (total of 48 sites). Clinical MM width (cMW) and digitally scanned MM width (dMW) were measured at baseline, post-operatively, and after 8 weeks of healing. Histological observations included measuring the distance from the free gingival margin to the mucogingival junction (MGJ) and the width of non-keratinized attached mucosa (NKAM). A linear mixed model was employed to analyse changes in MM measurements. Results: The mean gain of cMW was 3.17 mm (SD 1.63) in the control group and 4.27 mm (SD 1.91) in the fenestration group with a significant difference in favour of the fenestration group. The estimated mean difference was 1.45 mm (95% CI: 0.57-2.33; p = 0.002). Histologically, the increased mucosal width observed in the fenestration group, compared to the control group, was primarily characterized by non-keratinized epithelium. Conclusion: APF with periosteal fenestration enhances the attached mucosal width; however, this increase is predominantly composed of NKAM rather than orthokeratinized mucosa.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hong et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe34695ddcd3a253e709fhttps://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-292429
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper