PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026BMC Infectious Diseases1 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence, trend and resistance patterns of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in Bangladesh: a nationwide laboratory-based study

ARAninda Nurbaeti RahmanMSMohammad Julhas SujanSRS. M. Shahriar Rizvi

Key Points

  • The objective is to evaluate the prevalence, resistance patterns, and temporal trends of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in Bangladesh.
  • Conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility testing data from 2017 to 2020.
  • Included data from 34 microbiology laboratories, with 26 meeting quality criteria.
  • Data analyzed using STATA 17 after standardization with WHONET.
  • 12.3% of analyzed Enterobacterales isolates were identified as CRE, with higher prevalence in males and very young or elderly patients.
  • Annual prevalence of CRE remained stable, varying between 12.0% and 12.4% from 2017 to 2020.
  • Resistance to carbapenems was high, ranging from 75.3% to 100%, with extensive resistance to third and fourth-generation cephalosporins.

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) pose a significant public health threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries like Bangladesh, where efforts to contain antimicrobial resistance remain inadequate. CRE infections are major contributors to healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and are associated with high mortality, limited treatment options, and increased healthcare costs. This study evaluates the prevalence, resistance patterns, and temporal trends of CRE in Bangladesh using data from standard public and private microbiology laboratories. We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data from 2017 to 2020. Data were initially collected from 34 microbiology laboratories across Bangladesh, with 26 ultimately meeting quality criteria for inclusion. CRE was defined based on Clinical 8,274/50,142) were more frequently affected than females (9.5%; 6,978/73,791), with the highest prevalence among patients aged < 1 year (18.1%; 528/2,912) and ≥ 60 years (14.4%; 5,442/37,856). The annual prevalence of CRE remained stable over the study period: 12.3% (2,713/21,982) in 2017, 12.4% (4,709/37,896) in 2018, 12.3% (5,540/44,898) in 2019, and 12.0% (2,290/19,157) in 2020 (p = 0.427). CRE was most frequently detected in tracheal aspirates (57.7%; 1,481/2,567) and wound swabs (20.9%; 3,950/18,878) compared to urine (7.4%; 5,468/73,939). Indoor samples showed a significantly higher prevalence (18.4%; 6,402/34,727) compared to outdoor samples (8.8%; 6,876/78,005), suggesting a high burden likely associated with healthcare settings. Klebsiella spp. (24.9%; 7,995/32,067) had a higher proportion of CRE than Escherichia coli (7.9%; 5,846/74,060). Among CRE isolates, resistance to individual carbapenems was high: imipenem (75.3%–91.1%) and meropenem (93.9%–100.0%). Resistance was near-universal for third and fourth-generation cephalosporins, including cefotaxime (92.1%–99.3%) and ceftazidime (87.1%–97.6%), as well as the monobactam aztreonam (75.2%–97.5%). Resistance to aminoglycosides remained comparatively lower but still substantial, with amikacin and gentamicin resistance ranging from 61.5% to 86.4% and 68.1%–86.8%, respectively. CRE prevalence in Bangladesh remains high, with extensive resistance to carbapenems and β-lactams. However, the comparatively lower resistance to aminoglycosides suggests a narrow but valuable therapeutic window. Strengthened infection prevention, antimicrobial stewardship, and surveillance are urgently needed to contain further spread. Not applicable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rahman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe35995ddcd3a253e72abhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-12931-5
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper