PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Radiation0 citationsOpen Access

Prostate–Rectum Spacing from Apex to Base and Its Impact on Organs-At-Risk Dosimetry in Prostate Cancer SBRT

VNVictor NgJSJill SteeleESEdward Soffen

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how prostate-rectum separation affects dosimetry for organs at risk during SBRT for localized prostate cancer.
  • Thirty-three patients received a biodegradable balloon rectal spacer.
  • Patients underwent SBRT to 36.25 Gy in five fractions.
  • Prostate-rectum separation was measured at apex, mid-gland, and base on CT and/or MRI.
  • Rectal dose-volume parameters and mean organ doses were assessed via linear regression analyses.
  • Mean prostate-rectum separation was 16.6 mm with minimal rectal high-dose exposure.
  • Increased separation linked to reduced rectal dose-volume parameters at the apex and mid-gland.
  • Greater separation at the base corresponded to lower bladder mean dose.
  • Higher apical separation reduced penile bulb mean dose.
  • No acute gastrointestinal toxicity and limited low-grade genitourinary toxicity observed.

Abstract

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for localized prostate cancer delivers high doses per fraction, making dose constraints for the rectum and other organs at risk critical during treatment planning. This study evaluated the association between prostate–rectum separation, achieved with a biodegradable balloon rectal spacer at different anatomical levels, and corresponding organ-at-risk dose patterns. Thirty-three patients underwent transperineal balloon spacer implantation followed by SBRT to 36.25 Gy in five fractions. Prostate–rectum separation at the apex, mid-gland, and base were measured on CT and/or MRI and categorized as <10 mm, 10–14 mm, or ≥14 mm. Rectal dose–volume parameters and mean doses to the rectum, bladder, and penile bulb were assessed using linear regression analyses and group comparisons at 14 mm separation. Mean prostate–rectum separation was 16.6 mm overall, with minimal high-dose rectal exposure observed. Increasing separation was associated with reduced rectal dose–volume parameters at the apex and mid-gland, while greater base separation corresponded primarily to lower bladder mean dose. Increased apical separation was also associated with reduced penile bulb mean dose. No acute gastrointestinal toxicity was observed, and genitourinary toxicity was limited to low-grade events. These findings indicate that prostate–rectum separation varies by anatomical level and is associated with distinct organ-at-risk dose relationships in prostate SBRT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe37b95ddcd3a253e760ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/radiation6010008
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper