Abstract Target trial emulation (TTE) has demonstrated popularity because of its ability to improve the reliability of causal inference from observational data. Nevertheless, knowledge about the current use, potential challenges, and insights of target trials in oncology is scarce. A total of 90 TTE studies in cancer areas were identified through systematic reviews in PubMed and Embase. Among the 54 applications in cancer treatment, registry databases (44.4%) and overall survival (OS, 63.0%) were predominantly used as data sources and primary endpoints, respectively. Approximately 30 (55.6%) of the included TTE cases were associated with immortal time bias, and 21 (38.9%) were associated with prevalent user bias. Among the 21 trials from 13 studies that aimed to calibrate the results from preexisting randomized controlled trials (RCTs), only 42.9% met both statistical agreement and estimate agreement. The availability of fit-for-purpose data sources and uncertainty about result concordance were the main hurdles limiting the quantity and quality of TTE in oncology areas. Promoting regulatory acceptance by initiating special projects could be crucial for the expanded application of real-world data (RWD) using TTE. Potential solutions, such as the integration of electronic medical records at the regional or country level, linkage with insurance claims databases, the modernization of eligibility criteria, the use of OS as the primary endpoint, and other best practices, were recommended for improving the feasibility and quality of oncology TTE.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.