PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Water0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation and Management of Water Losses in Water Distribution Systems: Towards the Implementation of Directive (EU) 2020/2184

IDI. DeskaUKUrszula KępaAOAgnieszka Ociepa-Kubicka

Key Points

  • To examine the relationship between the infrastructure leakage index and other performance indicators for water losses.
  • Analyzed selected water distribution systems in southern Poland.
  • Calculated determination coefficients for linear relationships between indicators.
  • Compared infrastructure leakage index with various performance indicators.
  • Strong linear correlation between ILI and intermediate normalized PIs with R2 = 0.951.
  • Strong linear correlation between ILI and other PIs when expressed as volume per service connection (R2 = 0.7336).
  • Moderate correlation observed for percentage PIs related to water losses.

Abstract

In accordance with the provisions of Directive (EU) 2020/2184, the largest water supply companies in the European Union (EU) will be required to report real water losses starting from 2026. The recommended water loss performance indicators (PIs) are the infrastructure leakage index (ILI) rating method or “another appropriate method”. The article presents results of research aimed at examining the relationship between the ILI and other selected PIs for water losses in selected Polish water distribution systems (WDSs) located in southern Poland. The highest values of determination coefficients for the linear relationships between the ILI and PIs were obtained in the case of intermediate normalized PIs for real losses expressed both as a volume of water per km of mains per 1 m H2O of pressure (R2 = 0.951) and as a volume of water per service connection per 1 m H2O of pressure (R2 = 0.9365). A very strong linear correlation with the ILI was also obtained in the case of basic normalized PIs for real losses, expressed as the volume of water per service connection (R2 = 0.7336). The moderate linear correlation was detected in the case of the percentage PIs for water losses. Results show that the recommended indicators, which can be used when the ILI cannot be calculated, should be the intermediate or basic operational normalized indicators.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deska et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe38b95ddcd3a253e7783https://doi.org/10.3390/w18050527
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Adapting Water Resources Management to Climate Change in Water-Stressed River Basins—Júcar River Basin Case2024 · 11 citations
  2. 2From advanced hydraulic modelling to performance indicator for the efficiency of investments in leakage management of pressurized water systems2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3Issues in Implementation of EU Regulations in Terms of Evaluation of Water Losses: Towards Energy Efficiency Optimization in Water Supply Systems2024 · 19 citations
  4. 4Quantifying the global non-revenue water problem2018 · 363 citations
  5. 5Assessing the performance of urban water networks across the EU Mediterranean area: The paradox of high NRW levels and absence of respective reduction measures2013 · 32 citations