PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Viruses0 citationsOpen Access

Wavelength-Specific UV-C Inactivation of Viruses in Liquids: Dose–Response, Mechanistic Insights, and Structural Integrity—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

RHRoland HetényiDHDániel HannaZKZoltán Kopasz

Key Points

  • The central aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of UV-C irradiation for viral inactivation in liquid media.
  • Conducted a systematic review of 2813 records to identify relevant studies on UV-C irradiation.
  • Included studies focused on viral strain identification, dosage, and specific UV-C wavelengths.
  • Used meta-regression to analyze data from 16 standardized SARS-CoV-2 studies.
  • Found a strong dose–response relationship in UV-C inactivation (log_dose β = 3.38, p < 0.001).
  • Efficacy peaked at specific wavelengths: 267 nm (β = 6.42) and 275 nm (β = 3.78).
  • Identified that 253.7 nm exposure provided structural preservation for future applications.

Abstract

This study evaluates fragmented data on ultraviolet-C (UV-C, 100–280 nm) irradiation for viral inactivation in liquid media, supporting advances such as whole-pathogen vaccine development and downstream research. Included studies reported viral strain identification, baseline titers (PFU or TCID50), UV-C wavelength, dosage, and log reductions, excluding studies employing alternative treatments. We searched (PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science; 10 April 2024) and identified 2813 records, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I V2 to evaluate methodological rigor and inform improved reporting. Narrative synthesis summarized findings across viruses, while meta-analysis focused on 16 SARS-CoV-2 studies with standardized reporting. Meta-regression revealed a strong dose–response relationship (logdose β = 3. 38, 95% CI 2. 95, 3. 82, p < 0. 001) with low heterogeneity (I2 = 15. 1%). Strain and wavelength-specific efficacy peaked at 267 nm (β = 6. 42) and 275 nm (β = 3. 78), while 253. 7 nm offered structural preservation for downstream applications. Limitations included inconsistent dose reporting, matrix effects, and assay sensitivity. We propose a refined reporting framework and standard definitions for ‘inactivation’, ‘‘disinfection, ’ and ‘complete inactivation. ’ Our findings support reproducible UV-C evaluation, regulatory alignment, and safe implementation in pathogen control, biosafety, and clinical applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hetényi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe39d95ddcd3a253e79b9https://doi.org/10.3390/v18030276
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper