PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Briefings in Bioinformatics3 citationsOpen Access

Systematic evaluation of computational methods for cell segmentation

View Full Paper
RYRongrong YangGXGuangfu XueZWZuxiang Wang

Key Points

  • The aim is to systematically evaluate and classify computational methods for cell segmentation, focusing on deep learning approaches.
  • Developed a dual-dimensional classification framework for deep learning methods.
  • Classified methods into task-oriented and data-oriented categories.
  • Created a benchmark test covering both single-modal and multimodal segmentation methods.
  • Evaluated seven algorithms based on effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency across five diverse datasets.
  • Deep learning models outperform traditional algorithms in cell segmentation.
  • Advantages of deep learning are more pronounced when integrating image data with sequencing information.

Abstract

Abstract Cell segmentation plays a crucial role in elucidating cell structure and function, understanding disease mechanisms, and aiding pathological diagnosis. Current surveys primarily categorize methods by their technical evolution stages, which may not fully capture the paradigm shift brought by deep learning. Moreover, their evaluation scope is largely confined to image-only approaches, overlooking the significant potential of multimodal data in enhancing cell/nucleus segmentation performance. Therefore, we propose a dual-dimensional classification framework for deep learning methods. It categorizes such methods into two types: task-oriented (e.g. semantic or instance segmentation) and data-oriented (e.g. single or multimodal inputs). Based on this, we systematically classify and summarize methods across various segmentation tasks and imaging modalities. We also develop a benchmark test that covers both single-modal and multimodal methods. This test uses five diverse datasets, among which four are from conventional microscopy and one integrates sequencing with image data. Furthermore, it assesses seven algorithms based on three dimensions: effectiveness, robustness, and efficiency. Key findings indicate that deep learning models generally outperform traditional algorithms, with their advantage becoming more pronounced when image data is integrated with sequencing information.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe3af95ddcd3a253e7c68https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbag066
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Spatial transcriptomics and single-nucleus RNA sequencing reveal a transcriptomic atlas of adult human spinal cord2024 · 17 citations
  2. 2Atlas Guided Identification of Brain Structures by Combining 3D Segmentation and SVM Classification2006 · 52 citations
  3. 3BRAIN TUMOR DETECTION AND SEGMENTATION USING WATERSHED SEGMENTATION AND MORPHOLOGICAL OPERATION2014 · 58 citations
  4. 4CellBinDB: a large-scale multimodal annotated dataset for cell segmentation with benchmarking of universal models2025 · 6 citations
  5. 5InstantDL: an easy-to-use deep learning pipeline for image segmentation and classification2021 · 22 citations