PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026BMC Microbiology0 citationsOpen Access

Gut microbiota characteristics and its biological function analysis in patients with tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus co-morbidity

FXFeifan XuJRJingjing RenJMJuan Ma

Key Points

  • The research aims to analyze gut microbiota characteristics and their biological functions in patients with tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus co-morbidity.
  • Conducted 16s rRNA sequencing on fecal samples from 128 participants including patients with TB, DM, TB_DM, and healthy controls.
  • Analyzed alpha and beta diversity of gut microbiota.
  • Identified independent bacterial genera for diagnostic efficacy.
  • Employed PICRUSt2 analysis to investigate differentially expressed genes.
  • Significant decrease in alpha and beta diversity observed in the TB_DM group compared to healthy controls.
  • Identified top 3 bacterial genera with diagnostic efficacy: Enterococcus, Flavonifractor, and Romboutsia.
  • Combined genera achieved an AUC of 0.835 for diagnostic efficacy.
  • Found various differentially expressed genes associated with metabolic functions between groups.

Abstract

Tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus co-morbidity (TBDM) poses harmful for human health and not conducive to early control. The gut microbiota has been proven to play an important role in a variety of diseases. In this study, we investigated the characteristics of the intestinal flora according to 16s rRNA sequencing results in their fecal samples in TBDM, screened out independent bacterial genera to determine their diagnostic alone and in combination and explore their biological functions. A total 128 patients of 40 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM group), 40 patients with tuberculosis (TB group), 48 patients with TBDM who met inclusion and exclusion criteria and 40 healthy persons as control group (HC group). We found that the sparse curves of the four groups were stable. The OTU analysis showed the most genus classification in the HC group and the least ones in the TBDM group. Compared with the HC group, the α and β diversity were significantly decreased in the DM, TB and TBDM group, particularly in TBDM group. In the screening of independent genera, top 14 differential genera were found between the DM and the TBDM group and top 18 ones between the TB and the TBDM group. The top 3 bacterial genera Enterococcus, Flavonifractor and Romboutsia between DM and TBDM groups were identified for analyzing diagnostic efficacy. The AUC, 95%CI, sensitivity and specificity were 0. 742, 0. 638 ~ 0. 846, 64. 58% and 80. 00% in Enterococcus; 0. 663, 0. 547 ~ 0. 779, 75. 00% and 60. 00% in Flavonifractor; 0. 646, 0. 530 ~ 0. 762, 54. 17% and 77. 50% in Romboutsia and 0. 835, 0. 752 ~ 0. 918, 79. 17% and 75. 00% in combined them, respectively. Also, the top 3 different genera Paeniclostridium, Dialister, and Lachnospira were found between TB and TBDM groups for evaluating above diagnostic efficacy. The AUC, 95%CI, sensitivity and specificity were 0. 716, 0. 607 ~ 0. 824, 81. 25% and 57. 50% in Paeniclostridium; 0. 689, 0. 575 ~ 0. 803, 87. 50% and 50. 00% in Dialister; 0. 672, 0. 557–0. 786, 83. 33% and 55. 00% in Lachnospira; and 0. 914, 0. 853 ~ 0. 975, 85. 42% and 85. 00% in combined them, respectively. PICRUSt2 analysis indicated that differentially expressed genes (DEGs) predominantly influenced porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, as well as D-alanine metabolism between the DM and TBDM groups. Furthermore, the DEGs were primarily associated with porphyrin and chlorophyll metabolism, Alzheimer’s disease and carotenoid biosynthesis when comparing the TB group to the TBDM group. Our results provide key insights into the intestinal flora diversity, function and its independent genus in distinguishing TBDM, TB and DM patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe3d995ddcd3a253e7e8chttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-026-04870-7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper