With 96 federal counterterrorism laws, Australia surpasses nations facing greater terrorism threats, introducing unprecedented powers that challenge its legal system and democratic traditions, including press freedom. This study examines Australian media’s capacity to challenge authority and safeguard civil liberties amid expanding national security powers, focusing on Section 35P of the ASIO Act, Metadata Retention laws, and the Espionage & Foreign Interference Bill. A textual analysis of 460 news stories (2014–2024) reveals that while initial media resistance emerged, the lack of sustained campaigns reduced efforts to tokenistic gestures. These findings hold significant implications for evaluating the Australian media’s role as democracy’s watchdog. If the media struggles to defend its own freedoms, can it protect broader civil liberties? This study challenges conventional assumptions about the media’s role in safeguarding democracy and highlights weaknesses in checks and balances, particularly as government powers expand under the guise of national security.
Ali et al. (2026) studied this question.