PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Hip International0 citationsOpen Access

Oxidised zirconium heads show a lower linear wear rate than 28-mm metal heads against XLPE: a retrospective analysis

View Full Paper
AAAmit AtreyZTZoe ThompsonVPVeronica Pentland

Key Points

  • This study aims to compare the linear wear rates of oxidized zirconium heads to cobalt-chrome heads in total hip arthroplasty.
  • Retrospective analysis of 95 subjects with OxZr and 131 with CoCr heads
  • Both groups used 28-mm heads against highly cross-linked polyethylene liners
  • Linear and volumetric wear rates were analyzed using stereoisometric methods
  • OxZr had a linear wear rate of 0.030 mm per year compared to 0.046 mm for CoCr
  • Statistical significance was found with p = 0.0002 for linear wear
  • Volumetric wear rates showed no significant difference (p = 0.7377) between the two groups

Abstract

Aims: The use of highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) on the acetabulum has undoubtedly improved the wear rates and hence survivorship of total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the importance of head tribology is not known. Oxidised zirconium (OxZr) was introduced to offer the lower wear rates of ceramic but the strength of metal. Whether OxZr heads have any purported benefits in terms of lowering wear is not known. This study therefore aims to compare wear rates of XLPE against metal and OxZr heads over a 10-year period. Methods: A previous study has suggested we need a minimum 95 cases to show a statistically significant difference. Thus, in this 10-year retrospective analysis we included 95 subjects with a primary THA with a 28-mm OxZr and 131 patients with a 28-mm cobalt-chrome (CoCr) head, both against XLPE liners. Linear and volumetric wear rate comparisons were performed using a validated 2-dimensional stereoisometric analysis by an independent centre. Results: There were no significant differences for any of the patient demographics between the 2 groups, with >60% women in both groups and normally distributed age. Cup inclination angle was also comparable between the 2 groups. While there was no difference in volumetric wear rates ( p = 0.7377), the annual linear wear rate for OxZr was 0.030 mm (95% CI, 0.024–0.036) compared with 0.046 mm (95% CI, 0.038–0.054) for CoCr, a statistically significant difference ( p = 0.0002) Conclusions: The widespread use of XLPE has revolutionised THA. This study is the first to show a statistically significantly lower wear rate with the use of OxZr. Whether this is enough to justify the cost differential and whether it translates to better implant survivorship is still to be determined. But if wear limiting wear rates is associated with decreasing revision rates, the use of ceramicised metal may be of clinical benefit.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Atrey et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe44895ddcd3a253e86behttps://doi.org/10.1177/11207000251412753
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper