PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 26, 2026Cognition Technology & Work1 citationsOpen Access

Adaptations of drivers’ gaze behaviour during car-following as a function of vehicle automation, duration of use and prior driving experience

DSDamien SchnebelenEREmanuelle ReynaudMPMaëlle Pelerin

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how vehicle automation and prior driving experience affect drivers' gaze behaviour during car-following tasks.
  • Analyzed gaze behaviour across four automation conditions: Non-Automated, Automated Steering, Highly Automated Driving, and Fully Automated Driving.
  • Conducted observations over seven weeks with both unlicensed and experienced drivers.
  • Evaluated scan paths and visual exploration of driving scenes.
  • Automation shifts gaze behaviour from driving-control scan paths to scenery and supervision scan paths.
  • Novice drivers focus more on speed-monitoring, while experienced drivers show balanced gaze strategies.
  • No significant changes in gaze strategies over time were observed, indicating context dependence.

Abstract

Abstract Vehicle automation progressively shifts the driver’s role from active operator to passive supervisor, requiring behavioural adaptation. Although a timely issue, little is known about the influence of previous manual driving experience and the duration of automation use on those adaptations. Gaze behaviour during a car-following task were investigated under four automation conditions: Non-Automated (NA), Automated Steering (AS), Highly Automated Driving (HAD), and Fully Automated driving (FA). The sequences of visual explorations across the different areas of interest of the driving scene (i.e., scan paths) were analysed over seven weeks of automation use and for both unlicenced and experienced drivers. The findings reveal that automation alters the distribution of scan paths compared to manual driving. Specifically, automation promotes scenery and supervision scan paths at the expense of driving-control ones, which are crucial for monitoring the road and vehicle speed control. This shift became noticeable once the driver completely disengaged from the physical control of the vehicle, this function being supported by automation. Additionally, driving experience significantly influences gaze behaviour for each automation solution. Novice drivers focus more on speed-monitoring scan paths, whereas experienced drivers display more balanced scan paths. No significant changes in scan paths were observed over time, suggesting that gaze strategies are highly context-dependent. Altogether, this study provides a better understanding of the effects of automation on the dynamics of drivers’ gaze behaviour.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schnebelen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/699fe44895ddcd3a253e86dfhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-026-00861-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Supervisory Gaze Behaviour Under Different Automation Durations in Level 2 Driving: A First-Order Transition Analysis2026 · 1 citations
  2. 2On investigating drivers’ attention allocation during partially-automated driving2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Drivers and automation: a systematic review on road suitability for assisted and partially/conditionally automated vehicles2026
  4. 4The Dynamics of Attention Across Automated and Manual Driving Modes: A Driving Simulation Study2026
  5. 5On the impact of on-road partially-automated driving on drivers’ cognitive workload and attention allocation2024 · 10 citations