PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología1 citationsOpen Access

De-escalating breast and axillary surgery in breast cancer: evidence, controversies, and future directions

BSBaha SharafASAla’ SeifFAFadi Alawneh

Key Points

  • The aim is to explore the evolution and future of de-escalation strategies in breast and axillary surgery for breast cancer.
  • Review of over 20 landmark trials
  • Evaluation of current clinical guidelines
  • Assessment of emerging technologies
  • Analysis of global disparities in treatment approaches
  • Discussion of unanswered questions regarding high-risk subtypes
  • Reduction in treatment-related morbidity such as lymphedema and chronic pain is observed.
  • Emerging technologies like AI and liquid biopsy may enhance patient selection.
  • Significant controversies around applicability in high-risk breast cancer subtypes are noted.
  • Global disparities in the adoption of de-escalation strategies are highlighted.

Abstract

The surgical management of breast cancer has achieved considerable improvement, shifting from radical resections toward increasingly conservative approaches driven by the advances in systemic therapy, precision imaging, and tumor biology. De-escalation strategies reducing the extent of surgery in the breast and axilla, aiming to minimize treatment-related morbidity (e.g., lymphedema, chronic pain, impaired mobility), while maintaining oncologic safety. This review synthesizes evidence from over 20 landmark trials, critically examines current clinical guidelines, and explores emerging technologies (e.g., artificial intelligence, liquid biopsy) that may further refine patient selection. We also highlight global disparities in adopting de-escalation strategies and discuss unanswered questions, such as applicability in high-risk subtypes and long-term recurrence risks.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sharaf et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a1344fed1d949a99abe1b2https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1717340
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A phase III randomized trial of radiotherapy optimization for low-risk HER2-positive breast cancer (HERO): NRG-BR008.2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer — Primary Results of the INSEMA Trial2024 · 299 citations
  3. 3Minimally Invasive Complete Response Assessment of the Breast After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Early Breast Cancer (MICRA trial): Interim Analysis of a Multicenter Observational Cohort Study2020 · 91 citations
  4. 4First, do no harm: risk of secondary cancer after breast cancer treatment2022 · 7 citations
  5. 5NEONOD 2: Rationale and design of a multicenter non-inferiority trial to assess the effect of axillary surgery omission on the outcome of breast cancer patients presenting only micrometastasis in the sentinel lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy2019 · 35 citations