PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología1 citationsOpen Access

Profiling numeracy literacy among ninth-grade students: Empirical evidence from junior secondary education

AAAndes Safarandes AsmaraYYYusfita YusufAPAnggy Giri Prawiyogi

Key Points

  • To profile numeracy literacy among ninth-grade students in Indonesia using OECD indicators and geometry tasks.
  • Developed a profile based on OECD indicators adapted for the Indonesian geometry curriculum.
  • Administered seven open-ended geometry problems to students in multiple districts.
  • Conducted classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with students and teachers.
  • Used descriptive qualitative design with quantitative data to summarize test scores.
  • 85.71% of students scored below 60, indicating low achievement.
  • 14.28% scored between 60-80, considered medium achievement, with no students scoring above 80.
  • Students excelled in written communication but struggled with reasoning, argumentation, and mathematization.

Abstract

Numeracy literacy in this study refers to students' capacity to interpret quantitative information in context, mathematize situations, use representations, justify their reasoning, select strategies, and employ symbols and tools to support defensible decisions. To address Indonesia's low performance on PISA tasks, we developed an operational profile of 9th-grade students using OECD indicators adapted to the Indonesian junior high school geometry curriculum through Candi Jiwa-based items. Using a descriptive qualitative design with quantitative support, we administered seven open-ended geometry problems to students in Karawang, Purwakarta, and Subang. Test scores were summarized to classify achievement levels. At the same time, classroom observations and semi-structured interviews with students and teachers were used to diagnose reasoning and strategy tendencies and recurring error patterns. Results show that 85.71% of students scored below 60 (low), 14.28% scored 60–80 (medium), and none exceeded 80 (high). Students' strongest area was written communication, mainly descriptive or procedural (restating givens and listing steps). Weaknesses clustered in mathematization, reasoning and argumentation, representation, strategy selection, and use of formal symbols and mathematical tools, indicating procedural competence with limited transfer to contextual modeling. Candi Jiwa serves as a place-based anchor that can lower entry barriers and guide culturally grounded, cognitively manageable task design aligned with OECD processes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Asmara et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a1344fed1d949a99abe24dhttps://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v15i1.p291-318
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper