PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2026Evolving Earth0 citationsOpen Access

Standalone and Novel Hybrid ML Models for Estimating Stream Velocities in a River Channel with Vegetation

View Full Paper
SKSanjit KumarMAMayank AgarwalURUpaka Rathnayake

Key Points

  • The aim is to estimate stream velocities in river channels with vegetation using machine learning approaches.
  • Utilized standalone models: Reduced Error Pruning Tree (REPT), Random Forest (RF), and Random Tree (RT).
  • Developed hybrid models combining standalone models with Multi Scheme (MS) and Random Committee (RC) approaches.
  • Evaluated model performance using multiple metrics, including Pearson Correlation Coefficient and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency.
  • Hybrid models generally outperform standalone models and traditional empirical equations.
  • The MS-RF model achieved the highest accuracy metrics: R=0.957, NSE=0.915.
  • Following MS-RF, the best-performing models were RC-RF, RF, and RC-RT.

Abstract

Vegetation present in the flowing water bodies offers a substantial amount of obstruction to the flow. By influencing the flow velocities, these vegetative elements may alter the hydrodynamic characteristics of a river channel. Several laborites as well as field studies have been carried out for a better estimation of vegetation influenced stream velocities. This study investigates the applicability of artificial intelligence-based approaches for the estimation of velocities in a river channel, where the presence of vegetative elements influences a stream’s flow characteristics. To estimate the flow velocities, we made use of a Reduced Error Pruning Tree (REPT), Random Forest (RF), and Random Tree (RT) models as standalone models and used them with hybrid ML models like Multi Scheme (MS) and Random Committee (RC) models. In all, we explored nine ML models, viz., REPT, MS-REPT, RC-REPT, RF, MS-RF, RC-RF, RT, MS-RT, and RC-RT. Performance of the applied approaches has been evaluated by using several performance metrics (Pearson Correlation Coefficient ( R ), Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency ( NSE ), Agreement Index ( AI ), Root Mean Squared Error ( RMSE ), Scatter Index ( SI ), Percent bias ( PBias ), and Kling-Gupta efficiency ( KGE )). Hybrid ML models outperform their standalone variants as well as the empirical equations. Out of these models, MS-RF ( R=0.957, NSE=0.915, AI=0.977, SI =0.240, PBias=1.597, RMSE=0.072, and KGE=0.928 ) outperformed other approaches in terms of accuracy, followed by RC-RF, RF, RC-RT, MS-RT, RT, RC-REPT, REPT, and MS-REPT.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumar et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a134b8ed1d949a99abe3fehttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eve.2026.100115
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper