PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 2026Case Studies in Construction Materials1 citationsOpen Access

Effect of Elevated Temperature on Strength and Microstructure of Metakaolin-Based Geopolymer Composites having Fireclay and Silica Sands

View Full Paper
MOMohamed Hechmi El OuniAAAhmed A. Alawi Al-NaghiNGNejib Ghazouani

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate how elevated temperatures influence the strength and microstructure of metakaolin-based geopolymer composites.
  • Investigated four geopolymer composite mixes using different fillers, including fireclay and silica sands.
  • Exposed specimens to temperatures from 100 °C to 1000 °C for 30 and 120 minutes.
  • Conducted mechanical tests like compressive and flexural strength assessments.
  • Performed microstructural analysis using SEM, XRD, FTIR, and TGA.
  • Geopolymer composites showed superior thermal stability compared to ordinary Portland cement (OPC).
  • At 1000 °C for 30 minutes, OPC strength dropped by 81.6%, while the finest fireclay geopolymer increased strength by 3.77%.
  • After 120 minutes at 1000 °C, OPC experienced a 79.6% reduction, but fine fireclay geopolymer increased strength by 75.4%.
  • SEM and XRD analyses indicated fewer defects in geopolymer composites, showing enhanced microstructural integrity.

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of elevated temperatures on the strength and microstructure of metakaolin-based geopolymer composites incorporating fireclay and silica sands as fillers. The experimental program assessed the mechanical and thermal performance of four geopolymer composite mixes with varying filler types and particle sizes, alongside a reference ordinary Portland cement mix. Specimens underwent exposure to temperatures ranging from 100 °C to 1000 °C for durations of 30 and 120 minutes. Comprehensive evaluations, including compressive strength, flexural strength, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis, were conducted. The results highlighted that the geopolymer composites exhibited superior thermal stability compared to ordinary Portland cement. At 1000 °C for 30 minutes, the compressive strength of the Portland cement mix dropped by 81.6%, whereas the geopolymer mix with coarse fireclay showed a 74.5% reduction, and the mix with fine fireclay showed a 3.77% increase. After 120 minutes at the same temperature, the Portland cement mix experienced a 79.6% reduction, while the coarse and fine fireclay mixes showed a 26.78% reduction and a 75.4% increase, respectively. Despite some reduction in flexural strength with higher temperature and exposure duration, geopolymer mixes consistently outperformed Portland cement. The critical transition for metakaolin-based geopolymers was observed around 900 °C, where partial melting and void formation began to affect strength. Filler type and particle size played a key role in enhancing thermal resistance, with fine fireclay fillers contributing to improved matrix densification and sintering behavior. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analyses revealed fewer microstructural defects in geopolymer composites compared to ordinary Portland cement, emphasizing their superior thermal resistance in high-temperature environments. This study underscores the potential of tailored formulations of geopolymer composites for applications requiring robust performance under extreme thermal conditions. • Fine fireclay filler enhances compressive strength of geopolymer composite by 75.4% at 1000 °C. • Geopolymer composites show superior thermal resistance to OPC at high temperatures. • SEM analysis confirms fewer microstructural defects in geopolymer composites. • FTIR and XRD reveal structural densification and leucite formation in GC samples. • GC mixes exhibit lower mass loss and better thermal stability in TGA analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ouni et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a134fbed1d949a99abe777https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e05948
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancement of the properties of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag based Self Compacting Geopolymer Concrete by incorporating Rice Husk Ash2018 · 176 citations
  2. 2Processing and characterization of geopolymer and sintered geopolymer foams of waste glass powders2021 · 46 citations
  3. 3A review of high temperature properties of cement based composites: Effects of nano materials2023 · 39 citations
  4. 4Production of geopolymer concrete by utilizing volcanic pumice dust2021 · 132 citations
  5. 5Mechanical, Fracture, and Microstructural Assessment of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Geopolymer Composites Containing Na2O2021 · 63 citations