PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 20260 citations

The Effect of 6 Months of Dietary Counselling on Sleep Outcomes Among Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

View Full Paper
AVAuke J C F VerkaarIDIris van DammeEVEva R van Veldhuisen

Key Result

Six months of dietary counselling improved diet quality but did not significantly change sleep quality (-0.2 PSQI points, 95% CI -0.6 to 1.0) in patients with CVD.

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine if dietary counselling affects sleep outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases.
  • Conducted secondary analyses of a six-month randomised controlled trial.
  • Intervention group received dietary counselling to enhance adherence to dietary guidelines.
  • Control group received usual care.
  • Diet quality assessed using a scoring index ranging from 0 to 160.
  • Sleep quality measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index.
  • Diet quality improved more in the intervention group (from 104.7 to 117.0) compared to the control group (from 102.1 to 107.7).
  • No statistically significant changes in sleep quality between the groups, indicated by a 0.2 point change in PSQI.
  • No significant differences in sleep duration, onset latency, or efficiency were observed.

Structured PICO

Does 6 months of dietary counselling improve sleep outcomes in patients with cardiovascular diseases?

P
Population
112 patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), mean age 68.9 ± 9.2 years, 74% male, mean BMI 27.7 ± 4.0 kg/m2. 32% had poor sleep quality at baseline.
I
Intervention
Dietary counselling aimed to increase adherence to the Dutch dietary guidelines over 6 months
C
Comparator
Usual care
O
Outcome
Sleep quality assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 6 monthspatient reported

Six months of dietary counselling improved diet quality but did not significantly improve sleep quality, duration, or efficiency in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Limitations

  • Improvements in diet quality within this study might have been insufficient to affect sleep

Abstract

Sleep problems are highly prevalent among patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). We examined the effect of dietary counselling on sleep outcomes among patients with CVD. We performed secondary analyses within a previously conducted six-month randomised controlled trial among patients with CVD. Within the trial, the intervention group received dietary counselling aimed to increase adherence to the Dutch dietary guidelines and the control group received usual care. Diet quality was assessed with an index, in which higher scores (range 0-160) indicated better adherence. Sleep outcomes were assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. An overall score > 5 was classified as a poor sleep quality. Among the 112 patients with CVD included in these analyses (68.9 ± 9.2 years; 74% male; 27.7 ± 4.0 kg/m2), 32% had a poor sleep quality at baseline. Diet quality seemed to improve more in the intervention group (from 104.7 ± 16.5 to 117.0 ± 16.1) than in the control group (from 102.1 ± 22.2 to 107.7 ± 19.7). The intervention did not result in statistically significant differential changes over time between the intervention (n = 57) and control group (n = 55) for sleep quality (0.2 points on overall PSQI; 95% CI -0.6, 1.0), sleep duration (9.0 min; 95% CI -15.8, 33.8), sleep onset latency (3.8 min; 95% CI -3.5, 11.1), or sleep efficiency (-0.2%; 95% CI -4.0, 3.7). To conclude, counselling on a healthy diet did not result in better sleep outcomes among patients with CVD. Improvements in diet quality within this study might have been insufficient to affect sleep, or improving diet quality might not affect sleep among patients with CVD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Verkaar et al. (2026) studied this question. Six months of dietary counselling improved diet quality but did not significantly change sleep quality (-0.2 PSQI points, 95% CI -0.6 to 1.0) in patients with CVD.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a1357fed1d949a99abf735https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70311
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper