PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 27, 20260 citations

The Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions on Marketing Decisions and Effectiveness: Evidence from the Biopharma Industry

View Full Paper
VLVardit LandsmanSSStefan Stremersch

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how mergers and acquisitions affect marketing decisions and effectiveness in the biopharma industry.
  • Analyzed sales, prices, and detailing spending for 375 branded drugs acquired in 73 M&A deals from 2007 to 2020.
  • Compared pre-deal and post-deal marketing metrics such as detailing spending and price changes.
  • Examined the influence of the age of target drugs and acquirer's experience in therapeutic categories.
  • Acquiring firms reduce detailing spending on target drugs by over $1 billion in post-deal years.
  • Target drug prices increase on average after M&A, despite lower detailing spending.
  • Acquirers generate over $23 billion more in revenue in the two years post-deal.
  • Larger increases in detailing elasticity are associated with younger target drugs and acquirer's marketing experience.

Abstract

Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) may trigger adjustments to firms’ marketing decisions and their outcomes. Yet, prior literature provides little empirical insight regarding the nature of these adjustments. We address this gap in the context of the biopharma industry, analyzing data on sales, prices, and detailing spending for 375 branded drugs acquired in 73 M&A deals between 2007 and 2020. We find that, on average, acquiring firms (1) reduce detailing spending on target drugs, (2) increase target drug prices, and (3) achieve increases in detailing elasticity for target drugs after the M&A, compared to before. The younger the target drugs and the more experience the acquirer has in marketing drugs in the drugs’ therapeutic category, (1) the more likely we are to see reductions in detailing and increases in prices, and (2) the greater the likelihood that acquirers experience larger increases in detailing elasticity and reductions in price elasticity. For our 375 target drugs, acquirers generated over 23 billion more in revenue in the two post-deal years while spending over 1 billion less on detailing compared to the two pre-deal years. The paper provides a framework for firms regarding commercial returns on M&As and informs the debate on regulatory responses to M&As.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Landsman et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a1359eed1d949a99abfb06https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243725138950
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Effects of Mergers and Acquisitions on Marketing Decisions and Effectiveness: Evidence from the Biopharma Industry2025
  2. 2To merge or not to merge? The impact of mergers and acquisitions on corporate success in the pharmaceutical industry2024 · 8 citations
  3. 3The key drivers and success factors for M&A strategies in the biotechnological and pharmaceutical industry\m{1}2002
  4. 4Mergers, Product Prices, and Innovation: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry2024 · 26 citations
  5. 5Post-acquisition effects of mergers and acquisitions: an approach from the perspective of agency theory2025