PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Frontiers in Horticulture0 citationsOpen Access

Agrivoltaic layout types drive changes in raspberry summer microclimate

View Full Paper
ZSZoë ScheerlinckJMJ. A. MacdonaldCLCas Lavaert

Key Points

  • This study aims to understand how different agrivoltaic layouts influence the summer microclimate in raspberry cultivation.
  • Compared microclimate responses under semi-translucent and opaque panels with a conventional polyethylene tunnel.
  • Evaluated an opaque panel system against an open-field control across two production sites in the Netherlands.
  • Monitored photosynthetically active radiation, canopy air temperature, humidity, and vapor pressure deficit from July to August.
  • Agrivoltaic structures reduced incoming radiation, with semi-translucent panels providing better light distribution.
  • Opaque arrays cooled around solar noon on high-radiation days, while semi-translucent arrays sometimes caused midday warming.
  • Vapor pressure deficit in polyethylene tunnels was closer to agrivoltaic systems than open-air conditions.

Abstract

Soft fruit such as raspberry ( Rubus idaeus L.) are commonly cultivated under protective structures to shield plants from adverse weather and extend harvest periods. Agrivoltaic systems offer an alternative to disposable plastic hoop covers by combining crop cultivation with solar energy production, yet their effects on crop microclimate remain poorly understood in temperate regions. In this study, we investigated summer canopy microclimate responses to different agrivoltaic layouts at two raspberry production sites in the Netherlands. At the first site, we compared semi-translucent portrait panels and landscape opaque panels with a conventional polyethylene tunnel. At the second site, an opaque panel system was evaluated alongside an open-field control. We monitored photosynthetically active radiation, canopy air temperature, humidity, and vapor pressure deficit from July to late August and compared both daily averages and diurnal maxima and minima. Agrivoltaic structures substantially reduced incoming radiation, with semi-translucent panels providing more uniform light distribution than opaque arrays. Average daily canopy temperature differed little across treatments (≤0.5 °C), but distinct diurnal patterns emerged: opaque arrays consistently cooled around solar noon on high-radiation days (up to 0.5°C cooler than control), while semi-translucent arrays occasionally induced midday warming of about 0.4°C under wind-calm conditions. Vapor pressure deficit under polyethylene tunnels was more similar to agrivoltaic systems than to open-air plots. Wind and rainfall modulated the microclimate changes independently of PV layout. Our findings highlight within-season design-specific trade-off for summer conditions: opaque panels favor thermal buffering but reduce light uniformity, whereas semi-translucent panels improve spatial light distribution at the cost of limited buffering and occasional warming. Microclimate contrasts depended on panel material properties, and are consistent with differences in radiation balance arising from material properties and ground coverage ratio among polyethylene films, opaque panels, and semi-translucent modules. They provide initial evidence that agrivoltaic systems can offer microclimate moderation comparable to conventional plastic polytunnels, while simultaneously generating renewable energy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scheerlinck et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a285aa0a974eb0d3c00b59https://doi.org/10.3389/fhort.2026.1716398
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper