PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing0 citations

Putting the “Peer” Back in Peer Review

View Full Paper
NRNicholas Raposo

Key Points

  • The aim is to emphasize the role of kindness in peer review to improve feedback quality and scientific rigor.
  • Editorial approach discussing peer review practices
  • Incorporation of constructive feedback strategies
  • Emphasis on kindness and acknowledgment in reviews
  • Highlights the importance of positive reinforcement in reviews
  • Suggests that kindness can lead to improved manuscript quality
  • Promotes a collaborative approach to peer review discussions

Abstract

In Brief Kindness and helpful comments should be an important part of peer review, even if the recommendation is not to accept. Scientific integrity and rigor can be supported by being a colleague and acknowledging an aspect of the manuscript that is commendable while sharing your thoughts on how to make it better. In this editorial, Dr. Raposo, one of our 2025 MCN Editorial Fellows, shares his insightful strategies for effective encouraging peer review.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nicholas Raposo (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286240a974eb0d3c00e20https://doi.org/10.1097/nmc.0000000000001174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper