PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026BMC Neurology0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation added to robotic rehabilitation in patients with ischemic stroke: a randomized clinical trial

ÖKÖmer Dicle KızılİUİbrahim Halil UralSHSefa Haktan Hatık

Key Points

  • The study aimed to examine the effects of adding transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation to robotic rehabilitation for improving outcomes in ischemic stroke patients.
  • Randomized controlled trial design
  • 40 ischemic stroke patients aged 18-65
  • Patients assigned to robotic rehabilitation or combined treatment
  • Functional outcomes and neuromuscular activity assessed before and after 6 weeks
  • Outcomes included walking speed, motor function, spasticity, and quality of life.
  • Significant improvements in all outcomes in the combined treatment group (VRRG) (p < 0.05)
  • Greater improvement in walking speed in the VRRG compared to the robotic rehab group (mean difference − 1.84 s, p = 0.006)
  • Pain reduction was greater in the VRRG (mean difference − 1.55, p = 0.048)
  • The robotic rehab only group showed a greater decrease in spinal excitability marker (Hmax/Mmax ratio).

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effects of adding transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) to robotic rehabilitation on functional outcomes and neuromuscular activity in patients with ischemic stroke. This randomized controlled clinical trial employed a pre–post study design and was conducted in a hospital-based physiotherapy and rehabilitation clinic. A total of 40 patients with ischemic stroke, aged 18–65 years, were randomly assigned to either a robotic rehabilitation group (RRG) or a combined vagus nerve stimulation and robotic rehabilitation group (VRRG). Spasticity, walking speed, motor function, quality of life, muscle activity, and pain were assessed at baseline and after six weeks of treatment. Primary outcome measures were walking speed, motor function assessed by the Fugl–Meyer Assessment, and pain intensity. Secondary outcomes included electrophysiological measurements (H-reflex and F-wave parameters) and quality of life. Within-group analyses showed significant improvements in all outcomes in the VRRG (p < 0.05), whereas all outcomes except pain improved significantly in the RRG (p < 0.05). Between-group comparisons demonstrated greater improvements in walking speed in the VRRG compared with the RRG (mean difference − 1.84 s, 95% CI − 3.7 to − 0.7; r = 0.43; p = 0.006) and greater pain reduction in the VRRG (mean difference − 1.55, 95% CI − 2.5 to − 0.1; r = 0.30; p = 0.048). In contrast, a greater reduction in the Hmax/Mmax amplitude ratio—an electrophysiological marker of spinal excitability—was observed in the RRG. The findings suggest that transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation combined with robotic rehabilitation may provide additional benefits in terms of walking speed and pain reduction in patients with ischemic stroke. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on April 19, 2024. (Identifier: NCT06381089).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kızıl et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286240a974eb0d3c00e5chttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-026-04743-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper