PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Journal of energy resources technology.0 citations

Comparative Experimental Assessment of Methanol, Ethanol, and Butanol Fuels in a SI Engine: Combustion, Performance, and Emissions

View Full Paper
MHMhadi Abaker Ismael HarrounMEMohammed El-AdawyAKAlaa M. Khedr

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare the combustion, performance, and emissions of different alcohol blends in a spark-ignition engine.
  • Experimentally assessed multiple fuel blends: single alcohol blends, dual-alcohol blends, and a ternary blend.
  • Conducted tests at optimized ignition timing under constant operating conditions (75% load, 1500 rpm).
  • Measured combustion intensity, brake power, and emissions for each fuel blend.
  • B30 fuel blend showed the largest increases in peak in-cylinder pressure (39%) and heat release rate (30%).
  • B30 achieved the highest brake power, but exhibited lower brake thermal efficiency (BTE) at 27%.
  • E30 recorded the highest BTE at 30.3%, outperforming other blends and the neat gasoline.

Abstract

Abstract This study experimentally investigates the combustion, performance, and emission characteristics of a spark-ignition (SI) engine fueled with single, dual, and ternary alcohol–gasoline blends under optimized ignition timing conditions. The tested fuels include single alcohol blends containing 30% ethanol (E30), methanol (M30), and butanol (B30), a dual-alcohol blend (E15M15), and a ternary blend (E10M10B10), benchmarked against neat gasoline (G100). Experiments were conducted at constant operating conditions (75% load and 1500 rpm) while varying ignition timing. At the optimum ignition timing, all alcohol–gasoline blends exhibited significantly enhanced combustion intensity compared to G100. Relative to gasoline, B30 showed the largest increases in peak in-cylinder pressure and heat release rate (HRR), rising by 39% and 30%, respectively, followed by E30 (36% and 27%), M30 (24% and 21%), E15M15 (18% and 15%), and E10M10B10 (18% and 18%). In terms of engine performance, B30 achieved the highest brake power (+14% over G100); however, its efficiency was constrained by elevated in-cylinder temperatures (14% higher than G100) and increased thermal losses, resulting in a lower brake thermal efficiency (BTE) of 27%. In contrast, E30 recorded the highest BTE (30.3%), followed by M30 (29.6%), E15M15 (28.2%), E10M10B10 (28%), and G100 (24.5%). From an emissions perspective, the ternary E10M10B10 blend provided the most balanced outcome, achieving substantial reductions in HC and NOx while limiting increases in CO and CO2 compared to single-alcohol blends.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harroun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286240a974eb0d3c00f70https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071226
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper