PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems1 citationsOpen Access

Identifying Robust Policy Portfolios for Advancing the SDGs in China: An Integrated MADM Approach

View Full Paper
NYNing YuJLJuan Liu

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the impacts of cross-sectoral policy portfolios on sustainable development in China.
  • Developed an integrated policy assessment framework combining the iSDG-China model and MADM methods.
  • Simulated long-term dynamic impacts of policy portfolios on the 17 SDGs.
  • Ranked overall sustainability performance to identify robust and poorly performing portfolios.
  • Policy performance varies significantly across different SDGs.
  • Top-performing portfolios promote synergies among education, health, renewable energy, land, and water.
  • Single-policy portfolios generally perform poorly compared to multidimensional ones.

Abstract

Despite growing efforts toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the systemic impacts of cross-sectoral policy portfolios on China’s overall sustainability—spanning the economic, social, and environmental dimensions—remain insufficiently explored. Meanwhile, relying on a single aggregated method for overall SDG assessment may limit the reliability and robustness of evaluation results. To address this, we develop an integrated policy assessment framework that couples the iSDG-China model with an ensemble of multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) methods. Within this framework, the long-term dynamic impacts of policy portfolios on the 17 SDGs are simulated, and their overall sustainability performance is ranked to identify robust top- and bottom-performing portfolios that show consistent results across evaluation methods. Results show that policy performance varies substantially across SDGs: portfolios that strongly promote one goal may hinder others. The top-ranked robust portfolios consistently exhibit synergies among education access, universal health coverage, renewable energy expansion, land conservation, and water-use efficiency, whereas single-policy portfolios perform poorly. Comparative analyses further reveal the distributional characteristics of robust portfolios, differences between short- and long-term outcomes, and methodological consistency patterns across MADM methods. We conclude that multi-objective, cross-sectoral policy portfolios offer the most resilient pathways toward achieving overall sustainability. The proposed iSDG-MADM integrated framework enhances the reliability of sustainability assessments and provides robust and general policy recommendations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286490a974eb0d3c012echttps://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-026-01240-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Greater gains for Australia by tackling all SDGs but the last steps will be the most challenging2019 · 128 citations
  2. 2Aggregate SDGs to cover trade-offs and prioritization2020 · 10 citations
  3. 3Integration of interval rough AHP and interval rough MABAC methods for evaluating university web pages2018 · 208 citations
  4. 4Existing gaps in understanding Sustainable Development Goals interactions: Insights from a systematic review2025 · 16 citations
  5. 5Systems integration for global sustainability2015 · 1,310 citations