PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan0 citations

Unraveling year-long radial velocity variations in red clump region. I. Comprehensive analysis of a K0 giant star, 2 Draconis

View Full Paper
USUdomlerd SrisuchinwongJZJianzhao ZhouHTHuan-Yu Teng

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand the causes of near-yearly radial velocity variations in the star 2 Draconis.
  • Investigated stellar activity, instrumental profile effects, and sampling aliasing.
  • Conducted correlation analysis for periodic signals.
  • Evaluated phase stability through Keplerian fits.
  • Identified a stellar rotation period of approximately 270-320 days for 2 Dra.
  • The observed 340-day radial velocity signal is not linked to stellar activity or instrumental issues.
  • Proposed that the 340-day variation may be due to intrinsic variability or a potential gas giant companion.

Abstract

Abstract Slow-rotating evolved stars frequently exhibit radial velocity (RV) variations on annual timescales, complicated by instrumental systematics and aliasing in the one-year regime. Here, we investigate the origin of the near-yearly periodicity in 2 Dra, a star located in the red-clump region, assessing possible causes between stellar activity, instrumental profile (IP) effects, sampling alias, and planetary companions. We applied two independent approaches: (1) constraining diagnostic signals and performing a correlation analysis (r) between period-confined signals and (2) evaluating phase stability by partitioning Keplerian fits. These methods enabled us to examine the physical connections and phase coherence among stellar activity indicators, RV measurements, and IP diagnostics. Our analysis suggests a stellar rotation period of 270\!-\!320 d for 2 Dra. The 340 d RV signal does not appear to originate from stellar activity in this chromospherically quiet star (|r| 0. 33), nor from instrumental systematics near the annual period (|r| 0. 1). This conclusion is supported by contrasting phase behavior: the RV and stellar activity phases remain stable, whereas the IP phases do not. We therefore propose that the 340 d variation likely arises from either a small-amplitude intrinsic variability or a tentative gas giant companion with potential weak activity-induced modulation. The case of 2 Dra provides a framework for distinguishing the origins of 1 yr RV variations in other evolved stars.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Srisuchinwong et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286950a974eb0d3c01ad3https://doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psag007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper