PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluation of structural and thermal performance of polystyrene integrated cross laminated timber panels

EAEsra Lakot AlemdağOİOkan İlhanAÇAyça Akkan Çavdar

Key Points

  • This research assesses the structural and thermal performance of polystyrene-integrated CLT panels to optimize building materials.
  • Tested six P-CLT and CLT panels for lateral load performance.
  • Conducted thermal conductivity measurements on nine specimens.
  • Evaluated energy demand through simulations.
  • P-CLT panels showed a 16.1% reduction in thermal conductivity with EPS and 19.9% with XPS.
  • CLT panels reached a lateral load of 72.02 kN, while integrated panels were lower by 36% and 7%.
  • P-CLT panels displayed 47–50% higher displacement, indicating ductile behavior.
  • Energy simulations showed a 9–12% reduction in heating energy demand for P-CLT with XPS.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the structural and thermal performance of Polystyrene-Integrated CLT (P-CLT) panels, a hybrid system formed by integrating expanded (EPS) and extruded (XPS) polystyrene foam into the middle layer of cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels. Six P-CLT and CLT panels (54 × 1200 × 2400 mm) were tested for lateral load performance, and nine specimens (54 × 300 × 300 mm) were used for thermal conductivity measurements. P-CLT panels increased thermal insulation performance while maintaining load-bearing capacity, reducing thermal conductivity by 16.1% (EPS) and 19.9% (XPS). In lateral load tests, CLT panels reached 72.02 kN, while EPS- and XPS-integrated panels were 36% and 7% lower, respectively. Both hybrid panel types showed 47–50% higher displacement, indicating more ductile behavior. Stiffness was highest for CLT panels (3.44 kN/mm), while EPS and XPS panels measured 1.35 and 1.09 kN/mm, consistent with previous studies. Energy simulations showed that P-CLT panels, particularly with XPS, reduced heating energy demand by 9–12%, while uninsulated CLT systems increased demand by up to 46%. The P-CLT system provides a cost-effective sustainable solution for construction and renovation, representing one of the first experimental and simulation-based assessments of combined structural and thermal performance in hybrid CLT panels.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alemdağ et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286a70a974eb0d3c01b71https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41173-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of Insulation Strategies of Cross-Laminated Timber Assemblies on Energy Use, Peak Demand, and Carbon Emissions2024 · 13 citations
  2. 2Non-destructive assessment of hybrid CLT2026
  3. 3Flexural Behavior of Cross-Laminated Timber Panels with Environmentally Friendly Timber Edge Connections2024 · 4 citations
  4. 4Research on Lateral Resistance Performance of Prestressed Cross-Laminated Timber–Concrete Composite Structures under Reciprocating Loads2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Thermal Performance of a Prefabricated Wall System Based on Styroconcrete Incorporating Recycled Expanded Polystyrene: A Numerical Comparison with a Conventional Large-Panel Building System2026