PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Reciprocal Constraint Closure and the Emergent Planck Boundary

View Full Paper
APAndrew John Paton

Key Points

  • The paper aims to formalize a mechanism for lower-bound refinement scales resulting from reciprocal constraint interactions.
  • Introduces a structural mechanism to analyze interaction effects.
  • Explores scaling relationships without assuming spacetime discreteness.
  • Discusses backreaction and localization costs in relation to resolution.
  • Establishes a fixed-point admissibility boundary under specified scaling assumptions.
  • Identifies Planck length as a case derived from quantum and gravitational scaling.
  • Proposes a domain-neutral interpretation of minimal scale emergence.

Abstract

This paper formalises a minimal structural mechanism by which lower-bound refinement scales emerge from reciprocal constraint interactions. When localisation cost scales inversely with resolution and induced backreaction scales proportionally with cost, a fixed-point admissibility boundary arises under the stated scaling assumptions. The Planck length appears as a special case under standard quantum and gravitational scaling relations. The formulation does not assume spacetime discreteness and introduces no modified dynamics. Instead, it identifies a structural admissibility limit generated by reciprocal scaling closure, providing a domain-neutral interpretation of minimal scale emergence as a boundary of permissible refinement. An optional final section provides interpretive placement of the closure mechanism within the Paton System’s admissibility framework without altering the derivation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andrew John Paton (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286c90a974eb0d3c01f52https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18779476
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper