PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Orbital modulation of frequency content in Apollo deep moonquake records

LVLyara S. VillanovaEYElder Yokoyama

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how lunar orbital dynamics and surface conditions affect deep moonquake signals.
  • Analyzed deep moonquake clusters in relation to lunar orbital periods.
  • Utilized Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), spectrogram analysis, and Hilbert–Huang transform.
  • Examined data from Apollo seismic stations 12, 14, 15, and 16.
  • Y-component shows consistently higher high-frequency content compared to the x-component.
  • Frequency content varies with the Moon's position within the celestial plane.
  • High-frequency variability is linked to surface thermal effects from solar exposure.

Abstract

The mobilization of near-surface regolith beneath Apollo seismic stations represents a significant source of noise in lunar seismic records, particularly for low-amplitude deep moonquake signals. These shallow layers strongly affect seismic wave propagation, producing detectable ground motion beneath the instruments and modulating recorded amplitudes and frequency content. In addition to seismic sources, lunar records are influenced by surface thermal expansion driven by solar illumination, tidal stresses associated with the Moon’s orbital motion, meteoroid impacts, and local surface adjustments. Deep moonquake clusters are commonly enhanced through waveform stacking to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. In this study, we analyze deep moonquake clusters previously identified in relation to lunar orbital periods, focusing on variations in frequency content across the three seismometer components. Using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), spectrogram analysis, and the Hilbert–Huang transform, we examine clustered seismograms recorded at Apollo stations 12, 14, 15, and 16. Our results show that the y-component consistently exhibits higher high-frequency content than the x-component. The orientation of the y-component, aligned with the lunar east–west axis and parallel to the direction of orbital motion, suggests that frequency dispersion may be sensitive to changes in the Moon’s position within the celestial plane. In contrast, the observed high-frequency variability is likely associated with surface thermal effects linked to solar exposure. These findings indicate that sensors more susceptible to orbital variability are also more sensitive to surface and regolith-related motion, emphasizing the combined influence of orbital dynamics, thermal forcing, and local geological conditions on lunar seismic records.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Villanova et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286da0a974eb0d3c02283https://doi.org/10.20935/acadeps8148
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1New Views of Lunar Seismicity Brought by Analysis of Newly Discovered Moonquakes in Apollo Short‐Period Seismic Data2024 · 3 citations
  2. 2Moon crust and upper mantle revealed by seismic interferometry methods applied to Apollo seismic data2024
  3. 3Newly Discovered Shallow Moonquakes: General Characteristics and Source Parameters2024
  4. 4Newly Discovered Temperature‐Related Long‐Period Signals in Lunar Seismic Data by Deep Learning2024 · 2 citations
  5. 5Classifying Thermal Moonquakes Recorded in Apollo 17 Lunar Seismic Data Using Cross‐Correlation and Diurnal Temperature Variations2025