PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026RNA0 citations

Stalled translation on transcripts cleaved by RNase L activates signaling important for innate immunity

AKAgnes KarasikGJGrant D. JonesNGNicholas R. Guydosh

Key Result

2-5A treatment of WT and XRN1 KO A549 cells activated RNase L, resulting in detectable and translated mRNA 3' fragments with increased ribosome stalling at cleavage sites.

Key Points

  • This research explores how RNase L’s activity leads to ribosome stalling and affects cell death.
  • Utilized nanopore-based long-read sequencing to analyze mRNA fragments post-RNase L activation.
  • Implemented ribosome profiling to determine the presence of stalled ribosomes at cleavage sites.
  • Examined the role of the ribosome rescue factor PELO in ribosome stalling.
  • Measured the frequency of short ribosomal footprints from fragmented mRNA.
  • Identified that 3' mRNA fragments can be translated despite RNase L activation.
  • Found increased ribosome stalling at RNase L cleavage sites.
  • Loss of PELO correlated with a rise in short ribosomal footprints and enhanced ribotoxic stress response.

Structured PICO

P
Population
A549 human lung carcinoma cells (wild type and XRN1 KO) and HAP1 cells (wild type and PELO KO)
I
Intervention
Transfection with RNase L activator 2-5A
C
Comparator
Transfection reagent treatment without 2-5A
O
Outcome
Detection of 3' mRNA fragments, ribosome stalling at cleavage sites, and activation of ribotoxic stress response (RSR)

Fragmented mRNA generated by RNase L causes ribosome stalling, which is modulated by PELO and promotes innate immunity via the ribotoxic stress response.

Limitations

  • Study performed in cell lines, limiting clinical generalizability.
  • No human clinical trial data or patient outcomes were assessed.
  • Quantitative effect sizes and statistical significance values for primary endpoints not reported.
  • Cannot precisely determine what proportion of the total population of 3' fragments generated by RNase L gets translated
  • Unable to find conditions (time point and 2-5A concentration) that would result in an increased disome peak
  • Lack of a full knockdown and residual PELO in A549 cells could limit trends

Abstract

RNase L is an endonuclease that responds to infections by cleaving most host- and pathogen-derived single-stranded RNAs. This widespread RNA cleavage can lead to death of the infected cell via the ribotoxic stress response (RSR). An ongoing challenge is to understand how RNase L’s endonuclease activity triggers cell death to benefit the host. To address this question, we used nanopore-based long-read sequencing to show that 3’ mRNA fragments in the cell were not fully degraded after RNase L activation and that these fragments were translated by ribosomes. We further asked whether ribosomes on mRNA fragments stall when they reach 3’ ends created by RNase L. We used ribosome profiling to capture footprints protected by these ribosomes, which can be identified by their short length (15-18 nt). We found that RNase L activation increased the number of stalled ribosomes at RNase L cleavage sites. Loss of the ribosome rescue factor PELO increased the number of short footprints derived from stalled ribosomes and augmented the RSR. Our work therefore establishes a role for fragmented mRNA in causing ribosome stalling that promotes innate immunity via the RSR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Karasik et al. (2026) studied Human lung carcinoma (A549) cells wild type and XRN1 knockout with RNase L activation by 2-5A. 2-5A transfection to activate RNase L vs. Control transfection reagent only (no 2-5A) was evaluated on Detection and characterization of mRNA fragments generated by RNase L cleavage and translation by ribosomes. 2-5A treatment of WT and XRN1 KO A549 cells activated RNase L, resulting in detectable and translated mRNA 3' fragments with increased ribosome stalling at cleavage sites.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a286eb0a974eb0d3c023d3https://doi.org/10.1261/rna.080699.125
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper