PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Forests0 citationsOpen Access

Soil Carbon Flux Responses to Warming and Drought Are Mediated by Soil Moisture and Vary Among Quercus Species

ASAmna SaherHJHeejae JoJLJung-Bok Lee

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how warming and drought affect soil carbon fluxes in various Quercus species.
  • Conducted a factorial experiment with temperature increases of +3 and +5 °C and drought effects.
  • Examined CO2 emissions and CH4 uptake in Quercus variabilis and Quercus acutissima seedlings.
  • Monitored changes over three distinct warming periods in July and August 2024.
  • Warming increased CO2 emissions by 23%-26% initially, followed by a reduction of 26%-37% during rainy conditions.
  • Drought conditions decreased CO2 emissions by 12%-36%.
  • In Quercus variabilis, CH4 uptake initially decreased at +5 °C but later increased under both warming treatments.
  • Quercus acutissima showed no significant effects from warming or drought.

Abstract

Climate change intensifies temperature extremes and drought frequency. However, the interactive effects of warming and drought on soil carbon fluxes remain poorly understood, particularly during extreme temperature events and across plant species. We conducted a factorial experiment examining warming (+3 and +5 °C) and drought effects on soil CO2 emissions and CH4 uptake in one-year-old Quercus variabilis Blume and Quercus acutissima Carruth seedlings during three successive warming periods (period 1, 2–12 July; period 2, 19–30 July; and period 3, 7–18 August 2024). In both species, warming initially increased CO2 emissions by 23%–26% and subsequently reduced them by 26%–37% during period 2 (coinciding with the rainy season), highlighting critical temperature-moisture interactions. Drought reduced CO2 emissions by 12%–36%. CO2 emissions were positively correlated with soil moisture (r = 0.45–0.56). In Q. variabilis, warming initially reduced CH4 uptake at +5 °C; however, during period 3, uptake increased by 44.5% and 24.8% under +3 and +5 °C treatments, respectively, while the drought treatment reduced CH4 uptake by 11.7%. Contrarily, Q. acutissima showed no warming or drought treatment effects. These findings demonstrate that soil carbon flux responses to extreme climate conditions exhibit nonlinearity and are affected by soil moisture and species type.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saher et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a287130a974eb0d3c02715https://doi.org/10.3390/f17030293
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Role of methanotrophic communities in atmospheric methane oxidation in paddy soils2024 · 22 citations
  2. 2Soil warming-induced reduction in water content enhanced methane uptake at different soil depths in a subtropical forest2024 · 11 citations
  3. 3Effects of Rice Root Development and Rhizosphere Soil on Methane Emission in Paddy Fields2024 · 20 citations
  4. 4Methanotrophic activities in tropical landfill cover soils: effects of temperature, moisture content and methane concentration1999 · 81 citations
  5. 5Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature1985 · 4,668 citations