PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Cancers0 citationsOpen Access

Outpatient Versus Inpatient Administration of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Review of Clinical, Economic, and Humanistic Outcomes

TGTara GregoryKBKevin C de BragancaVAVictoria R. Alegria

Key Points

  • Evaluate the differences in clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes between outpatient and inpatient administration of cilta-cel in multiple myeloma.
  • Conducted a systematic literature search across MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library.
  • Included studies of adults receiving cilta-cel that reported efficacy, safety, and quality of life outcomes.
  • Synthesis of findings was descriptive due to heterogeneity among studies.
  • Outpatient administration showed a high overall response rate of 95% during a median follow-up of 4.6 months.
  • Inpatient administration had a median overall response rate of 91%, with lower 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates compared to outpatient.
  • Most outpatient patients were later hospitalized (86-93%) but had shorter stays compared to inpatient cohorts.
  • Estimated cost savings of ~$19,000 per outpatient-treated patient.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma is typically administered inpatient (IP) to monitor for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Because cilta-cel toxicities are typically delayed, outpatient (OP) administration (infusion and early monitoring) is being explored. We synthesized available evidence on OP and IP administration. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to August 5, 2025, supplemented by conference and gray literature searches. Eligible studies of adults with multiple myeloma receiving cilta-cel reported efficacy, safety, resource use, costs, and/or quality-of-life outcomes; findings were synthesized descriptively due to heterogeneity. Results: Seventy-four records (56 studies) were included; 90 patients received OP cilta-cel. OP clinical evidence (primarily three real-world studies) showed high response rates (ORR: 95%; median follow-up 4. 6 months) and reported 1-year PFS and OS of 86% and 96%. In IP studies, median ORR was 91%, with median 1-year PFS 76% and median 1-year OS 85%. Any-grade CRS and ICANS occurred in 79–84% and 17–22% of OP patients (largely low grade) ; IP cohorts reported a median ICANS incidence of 17% (range 5–23%). Most OP patients were later hospitalized (86–93%), but stays were shorter (median 4–6. 5 days) than in an IP cohort (median 19 days). Comparisons were unadjusted and may reflect selection differences. One modeling-based economic analysis estimated savings of ~19, 000 per OP-treated patient. Conclusions: OP cilta-cel appears feasible for selected patients and may reduce costs without compromising outcomes. Findings are descriptive and hypothesis-generating and prospective multicenter studies are needed to define long-term safety, durability, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gregory et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a2877b0a974eb0d3c03389https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18050755
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with multiple myeloma administered ciltacabtagene autoleucel in outpatient versus inpatient settings after one to three prior lines of therapy2026
  2. 2Real-world healthcare resource utilization and clinical outcomes among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma receiving ciltacabtagene autoleucel after four or more prior lines of therapy in inpatient versus outpatient settings2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Clinician and administrator perspectives on outpatient administration of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma2024 · 6 citations
  4. 4Clinical outcomes with ciltacabtagene autoleucel among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after four or more prior lines of therapy overall and among subgroups based on age, frailty, and CRAB symptoms2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5FREEDOMM: Fifth-Line or Later Real-World Evaluation of Efficacy and Disease Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma with Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel: Treatment-Free Interval and Overall Survival in the USA2026 · 1 citations