PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026SAGE Open0 citationsOpen Access

How Intangible Cultural Heritage Protection Reduces Urban–Rural Income Inequality

View Full Paper
QDQi DuanXZXunchang Zhang

Key Points

  • This research investigates how the conservation of intangible cultural heritage affects income inequality between urban and rural areas.
  • Utilized a quasi-natural experiment based on the designation of National Representative ICH Items.
  • Employed a difference-in-differences (DID) approach using county-level data.
  • Conducted mechanism analyses to identify transmission channels.
  • Performed heterogeneity analysis on different categories of ICH.
  • Counties recognized for national ICH membership have a 2.4% smaller urban–rural income ratio.
  • Key mechanisms include increased enterprise formation and growth in the service sector.
  • Certain categories of ICH, like traditional dance and music, have pronounced effects on reducing income gaps.
  • ICH protection raises rural incomes from wages, businesses, and property more than urban incomes.

Abstract

China’s rich intangible cultural heritage (ICH) offers a unique context for examining the economic implications of cultural preservation. This study exploits the designation of National Representative ICH Items as a quasi-natural experiment and employs a difference-in-differences (DID) approach based on county-level data to assess the impact of ICH conservation on the urban–rural income gap. The results show that counties approved for the national ICH list experience, on average, a 2.4% smaller urban–rural income ratio than non-approved counties, suggesting that ICH protection contributes to narrowing income disparities. Mechanism analyses reveal that the promotion of new enterprise formation and the expansion of the service sector are key transmission channels. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that four categories of ICH items, including traditional dance, traditional music, folk art, and folk literature, and newly added ICH items exhibit more pronounced effects in reducing the urban–rural income gap. Complementary micro-level evidence demonstrates that ICH protection significantly raises rural residents’ wage, business, transfer, and property incomes, with stronger effects relative to their urban counterparts. These results highlight the potential of cultural heritage conservation as a pathway to inclusive and sustainable rural development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Duan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a2877b0a974eb0d3c03423https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261420119
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper