PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Sensors0 citationsOpen Access

Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Classification of Upper-Limb Motion Using EEG and EMG Signals: A Review

IBIsabel BandesYKYasuharu Koike

Key Result

Deep Learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks, were reported as the best performing model in 85 studies achieving classification accuracies exceeding 90% in many cases, outperforming traditional models like LDA and SVM, which also showed strong performances with many results exceeding 95%.

Key Points

  • This review aims to summarize the use of artificial intelligence in classifying upper-limb motions from EEG and EMG signals.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Searched literature in PubMed, IEEEXplore, and Web of Science.
  • Included 301 eligible studies published before June 2025.
  • Analyzed trends from traditional machine learning to deep learning.
  • Indicated a shift from classical classifiers like LDA and SVMs to deep learning methods.
  • Found that CNNs are the most commonly used algorithms.
  • Identified significant performance improvements from LSTM networks and Transformers.
  • Highlighted that 60% of studies utilized EEG alone, with only 7% using EEG-EMG hybrid systems.

Study Design

Type

Systematic Review (n=301)

Structured PICO

P
Population
301 eligible studies on the application of artificial intelligence in classifying upper-limb motion using Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Electromyogram (EMG) signals
I
Intervention
Artificial intelligence (AI) including Traditional Machine Learning (TML) and Deep Learning (DL) architectures
O
Outcome
Classification of upper-limb motion

While deep learning is increasingly replacing traditional machine learning for upper-limb motion classification, there is a significant underutilization of hybrid EEG-EMG signal fusion.

Limitations

  • Heterogeneity among studies in experimental paradigms, signal processing, evaluation protocols, and performance metrics complicates direct comparison.
  • The use of normalized accuracy assumes balanced class distribution, which may not be true in practical settings leading to potential bias.
  • Lack of correlation between dataset size or public/private dataset origin and performance may reflect overfitting or methodological confounders.
  • Limited use of hybrid EEG-EMG approaches despite theoretical benefits.
  • Reported accuracies across studies may overestimate generalizability due to small sample sizes and potential overfitting to subject-specific data.

Abstract

This systematic review summarizes the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in classifying upper-limb motion using Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Electromyogram (EMG) signals, focusing on the field’s progression from Traditional Machine Learning (TML) to Deep Learning (DL) architectures. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search of PubMed, IEEEXplore, and Web of Science yielded 301 eligible studies published up to June 2025. The results indicate a change from classical classifiers like Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Support Vector Machines (SVMs) toward DL approaches. While Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) remain the most frequently implemented, emerging architectures, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Transformers, have demonstrated remarkable performance. Despite the rise of DL, classical models remain highly relevant due to their robustness and efficiency. This review also identifies a heavy reliance on EEG-only modalities (60%), with only 7% of studies utilizing hybrid EEG-EMG systems, representing a potential missed opportunity for signal fusion.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bandes et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Human participants with non-pathological EEG and/or EMG signals used for upper-limb movement intent classification (n=301). Artificial intelligence models (Traditional Machine Learning and Deep Learning) for classification of upper-limb motion using EEG and/or EMG signals vs. Classical classifiers (e.g., LDA, SVM) versus Deep Learning models (e.g., CNN, LSTM, Transformers, Autoencoders) was evaluated on Classification accuracy of upper-limb motion intent from EEG and/or EMG signals. Deep Learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks, were reported as the best performing model in 85 studies achieving classification accuracies exceeding 90% in many cases, outperforming traditional models like LDA and SVM, which also showed strong performances with many results exceeding 95%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a2878e0a974eb0d3c035d7https://doi.org/10.3390/s26051457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper