PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 28, 2026Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Histopathology of Inner Ear Malformations: Potential Prognostic Factors and Their Influence in the Decision-Making Between CI and ABI

View Full Paper
LSLevent SennaroğluHacettepe UniversityDRda Costa Monsanto RafaelDLD. J. LeeMassachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

Key Points

  • To evaluate histopathological findings in inner ear malformations to understand variability in cochlear implantation outcomes.
  • Evaluation of twenty temporal bone specimens from ten donors with inner ear malformations.
  • Classification of inner ear malformations including cochlear hypoplasia, incomplete partition, and normal cochlear anatomy.
  • Analysis of cochlear morphology focusing on inner and outer hair cells and spiral ganglion cells.
  • Sixteen specimens were classified as cochlear hypoplasia, while two were incomplete partitions and two had normal anatomy with absent cochlear nerves.
  • Mean spiral ganglion cell loss in cochlear hypoplasia type III specimens was 62%.
  • Presence of asymmetric development impacts decision-making for implant placement.

Abstract

Importance Histopathological findings are important to guide our decision between cochlear and auditory brainstem implant in inner ear malformations (IEM) with cochlear hypoplasia (CH), incomplete partition (IP), and common cavity. Objective Cochlear implantation (CI) has variable outcome in IEM. Histopathology of IEM is evaluated to understand the causes of this variation. Design Evaluation of human temporal bone specimens with IEM. Participants Twenty temporal bone specimens from 10 donors who had IEMs were evaluated. Main outcome measures Classification of IEM and analysis of cochlear morphology inner and outer hair cells, spiral ganglion cells, and cochlear nerve (CN) to understand the functional outcome of implantation. Results Among the temporal bones with IEMs, 16 were classified as CH, 2 were IPs type II, and 2 had a normal cochlear anatomy, but absent CNs. The CN was hypoplastic in 3 specimens with CH-III. The nerve was lying adjacent to the bony wall, which would be difficult to demonstrate with current magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The mean percentage of loss of spiral ganglion cells in CH-III among our specimens was 62%. Some specimens showed asymmetric development, which will play a crucial role in the benefit from CI. Two specimens from the same donor with a fully-developed cochlea demonstrated absent CN. Conclusion Better MRI sequences are needed to demonstrate the hypoplastic CN adjacent to the wall of the internal auditory canal. Audiological examination is of paramount importance to demonstrate the presence of neural connection between the cochlea and the brainstem. In asymmetric developments between 2 sides, more developed side should be chosen for CI. Depending on the findings cochlear or auditory brainstem implants may be chosen for the contralateral findings. If there is only one implant available, the side with the better developed CN should be picked.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sennaroğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a287e20a974eb0d3c03ac6https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216251408785
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper